拒不支付劳动报酬罪适用研究

发布时间：2018-03-13 14:35

本文选题：拒不支付劳动报酬　切入点：劳动者　出处：《中国青年政治学院》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国对拒不支付劳动报酬行为（下文简称“欠薪”）入罪与否进行了长时间的理论研究和探讨。传统观点认为，“欠薪”行为是以债权债务为前提的民事纠纷，在民法、劳动法等领域可以继续进行法律完善，刑法入罪意义不大，并不能解决根本问题；支持者认为，“欠薪”行为严重侵害劳动者的合法权益，引发众多群体性事件，已经成为影响社会安定的重要隐患，刑法入罪能对其起到有效的遏制作用，更好维护社会的稳定，保护劳动者自身权益；还有折中者认为，，“欠薪”行为是否需要纳入刑法调整范围，还需要进行调研，立法是有步骤的，还要考虑实操性等。以上争论究竟孰是孰非，立法机关已经给出了答案。2011年2月25日，《刑法修正案(八)》将“恶意欠薪”行为列入侵犯财产罪一章中，作为第276条之一，并正式确定为“拒不支付劳动报酬罪”。该罪一出台，就引起了学术界和司法界的广泛关注，对本罪的理论依据和适用规范进行探讨。随着2013年1月《最高人民法院关于审理拒不支付劳动报酬刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释（》以下简称《拒不支付劳动报酬案件解释》）出台，针对拒不支付劳动报酬罪所涉及的概念界定、定罪量刑标准、单位犯罪等问题，进一步明确了相关刑事案件的法律适用标准。然而新罪入刑，对本罪的探讨仅仅限于刑法学的一般讲述，对某些基本概念的定性还未达成统一共识，缺乏配套制度和司法标准，阻碍了其发挥应有的威慑力，该罪名的完善工作有待更深层次的探讨。本文适当采用文献研究法和比较研究法，以现有文献、政策法规和地方性档案材料的总结和概括为基础，以劳动法所调整的劳动关系为背景，从刑法理论着手，结合劳动法和行政法规等相关法律规定对拒不支付劳动报酬罪构成要件进行辨析，对模糊概念进行界定，解决司法实践中适用本罪的若干问题，以期能够有助于法律的完善。本文共分为三个部分，从拒不支付劳动报酬罪的立法背景、理论支持、构成要件和司法认定等方面进行由浅入深的探讨，试图在汇集他人观点的同时进行归纳总结，得出自己的结论。第一部分，梳理本罪的立法进程，明确本罪入罪的理论依据。第二部分，对犯罪构成进行全面分析，对条文中的模糊概念进行界定。第三部分，在认定犯罪构成的基础上进一步明确罪与罪之间的区别、以及结果加重犯的成立、量刑情节的考量等。
[Abstract]:Our country does not pay remuneration to refuse (hereinafter referred to as "wages") were studied theoretically and discussed the long time the crime or not. The traditional view that "wages" is the debt to the creditor is the premise of civil disputes in the civil law, labor law and other fields can continue in the perfection of the law, the criminal law the crime is not meaningful, and can not solve the fundamental problem; supporters believe that the "wages" serious infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of workers, causing many mass incidents, has a significant impact on social stability, the crime of criminal law can effectively curb the better, maintain social stability, protect the rights and interests of workers; and the compromise that the "wages" whether need to be included in the scope of the criminal law, but also the need for research, legislation is step by step, but also consider the practical operation. The above arguments is actually right, legislation Authorities have been given the answer.2011 in February 25th, "criminal law amendment (eight) >" malicious wages "included in the crime of property violation in the chapter, as one of 276th, and formally identified as the crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration." the introduction of a crime, has aroused widespread concern in academic and law the theoretical basis of this crime and the applicable codes are discussed. With the January 2013 "the Supreme People's Court on the trial of refusing to pay labor remuneration applicable law in Criminal Cases Interpretation of several issues (hereinafter referred to as < > cases on refusing to pay labor remuneration of Taiwan, explanation >) for the concept of crime of refusing to pay labor remuneration to the definition and the standard of conviction and sentencing, unit crime, to further clarify the law applicable standards related to criminal cases. However, the new crime penalty, study of the crime is only limited to the general about criminal law, for some basic concepts Qualitative consensus has not yet been reached. Lack of supporting system and judicial standard hinders its effective deterrence. The perfection of the accusation needs further exploration.
In this paper, using the appropriate method of literature research and comparative study, based on the existing literature, policies and regulations and local archival materials are summarized and based on the labor law to adjust labor relations as the background, starting from the theory of criminal law, combined with the relevant provisions of the labor law and the law administrative regulations for refusing to pay labor remuneration crime analysis, the definition of fuzzy concept, solve some problems of the application in judicial practice, in order to help improve the law.
This paper is divided into three parts, from the legislative background of the crime of refusing to pay remuneration of theoretical support, constitution and cognizance of the attempt to summarize from the shallower to the deeper, while collecting the views of others, to draw their own conclusions. In the first part, combing the legislative process of the crime, the crime into clear theoretical basis the crime. The second part of the crime to conduct a comprehensive analysis, the definition of the concept of fuzzy provisions. In the third part, further clarify the distinction between the crime and the crime based on the constitution of crime identification, and the establishment of the result aggravated crime, sentencing considerations.

【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924.3

【参考文献】