论专利侵权诉讼中的临时禁令制度

发布时间：2018-04-11 09:14

本文选题：专利侵权诉讼 + 临时禁令　；参考：《对外经济贸易大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】：停止侵犯专利权临时措施制度的建立是以我国加入世贸组织,满足TRIPS协定的要求为时代背景的,这一新制度的建设还处于起步阶段,不少问题有待明确。本文意在通过介绍、比较美国和我国专利侵权诉讼中的临时禁令制度,以及TRIPS协定的相关规定,对该制度的历史发展、禁令审查的考虑因素,程序规则进行阐述,并结合我国司法实践中的相应问题展开讨论。笔者认为,首先,应在立法上对停止侵犯专利权临时措施制度中的一些规定予以明确和具体化,例如,禁令审查时各考虑因素的衡量标准,担保方式和数额的确定,禁令的解除、对错误禁令申请的损害赔偿等。其次,相关法律和司法解释在一些方面仍缺乏可操作性,如法院须在收到申请后48小时内裁定核发或不核发临时禁令使得法院没有足够的时间对专利的有效性、是否存在侵权事实和难以弥补的损害、如何确定担保数额等问题进行审查。而程序上缺乏可操作性往往会影响实体审查标准的适用,因此有必要根据司法实践的情况对此类规定进行修订和完善。再者,各国临时禁令制度程序规则的不同使得我国法院在借鉴他国做法时,比如引入临时禁令的听证程序,必须注意要与我国现行禁令制度的诉讼程序规则相衔接,以规范其操作及明确其法律效力。最后,注重收集整理判例,并要求法院在裁定书中就应当考量的因素阐明其准予或驳回临时禁令的具体原因,对规范、统一法院在临时禁令案件中的司法实践将有着非常积极的推动作用。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the system of temporary measures to stop patent infringement is based on China's entry into the WTO and meets the requirements of the TRIPS Agreement. The construction of this new system is still in its infancy, and many problems need to be clarified.The purpose of this paper is to introduce and compare the temporary injunction system in patent infringement litigation between the United States and China, as well as the relevant provisions of the TRIPS Agreement, and to expound the historical development of the system, the considerations of the prohibition review, and the procedural rules.It also discusses the corresponding problems in judicial practice in our country.In my opinion, first of all, some provisions in the system of stoppage of patent infringement should be clearly defined and specified in legislation, for example, the measure of the factors taken into account in the review of the prohibition, the way of security and the determination of the amount.The lifting of an injunction, damages for an erroneous injunction, etc.Second, the relevant legal and judicial interpretations are still inoperable in some respects, such as the fact that the court has to decide within 48 hours of the receipt of the application that the granting or non-granting of an interim injunction does not allow the court sufficient time to be valid for the patent.Whether there are tort facts and irreparable damages, how to determine the amount of guarantee to be examined.However, the lack of maneuverability in procedure often affects the application of substantive review standard, so it is necessary to revise and perfect this kind of regulation according to the judicial practice.Furthermore, the different procedural rules of the interim injunction system in various countries make our courts draw lessons from the practice of other countries, such as introducing the hearing procedure of the interim injunction system, and we must pay attention to the connection with the procedural rules of the current injunction system of our country.In order to regulate its operation and clarify its legal effect.Finally, pay attention to collecting and sorting out the jurisprudence, and ask the court to clarify the specific reasons for granting or rejecting the provisional injunction in the ruling, and to clarify the specific reasons for granting or dismissing the interim injunction.The judicial practice of the unified court in the case of temporary injunction will play a very positive role.
【学位授予单位】：对外经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D925.1;D923.42

【引证文献】