工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权竞合之研究

发布时间：2018-06-03 07:35

本文选题：请求权竞合 + 工伤保险赔偿请求权　；参考：《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：现代社会中,随着各国法律制度的健全,对于工伤事故人身伤害的处理出现了多元的赔偿机制,出现了工伤保险赔偿与人身侵权损害赔偿并存的局面。在工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权发生竞合时,各国采取了不同的处理模式,主要分为选择模式、兼得模式、补充模式和替代模式。我国现阶段在处理工伤事故时,关于工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权的竞合问题,由于现行相关法律却没有做出明确具体的规定,而地方立法和各级政府的行政立法所规定的处理模式各异,导致各地司法实践不统一,出现了“同命不同偿”的现象,影响了法律的统一性和权威性。研究工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害妣偿请求权的性质和两者的关系,确定统一的处理模式,充分发挥各项制度的功能,不仅有利于保障我国劳动者合法权益,稳定和改善劳动关系,而且有利于我国社会主义法治建设。由于民法领域的请求权竞合理论的研究核心正是关于一个生活事件受多个法律规范评价时的处理,因此,借鉴吸收请求权竞合理论的相关学说成就,对研究处理工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权之间的关系具有重要意义。本文共分为四章。第一章是关于请求权竞合理论以及其对工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求竞合处理的启示。通过介绍评析请求权竞合的主要学说,提出了请求权竞合的实质是法律规范的竞合,而同一生活事实只能产生一个请求权,不能重复评价,进而提出了请求权竞合理论对工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求竞合的启示,即从法律规范角度解决两种请求权竞合问题和禁止重复评价。第二章是关于工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权之竞合。本章主要先从工伤救济制度的发展历程上分析工伤保险赔偿请求权基础与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权基础的差异,再从赔偿义务主体、救济途径、价值定位等多方面分析了两种请求权的差异。第三章是关于各国对两种请求权竞合的处理模式。首先介绍并评析了各国对两种请求权竞合的四种模式,即选择模式、替代模式、兼得模式和补充模式；然后法律规范、行政立法和地方性法规和最高法院制定的相关规定三个层面,分析了我国立法实践中对两种请求权竞合处理中不足；最后介绍并评析了我国学者对两种请求权竞合处理的观点。第四章是关于制度建立的建议。本章主要是对构建解决工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权赔偿请求权竞合制度设想,确立了公平、效率、充分赔偿及工伤保险赔偿优先四大原则,并提出了构建附带追偿权的工伤保险统一赔偿制度的设想。
[Abstract]:In modern society, with the improvement of the legal system of various countries, there is a pluralistic compensation mechanism for dealing with personal injury caused by industrial accidents, and a situation of coexistence of compensation for injury insurance and compensation for personal infringement. When the claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance is competing with the claim for compensation for personal tort, different countries adopt different treatment modes, which are mainly divided into three modes: selective mode, concurrent mode, supplementary mode and alternative mode. At the present stage of dealing with industrial accidents in our country, there is no clear and specific regulation on the concurrence between the right to claim for compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for damages caused by personal infringement, because the existing relevant laws have not made clear and specific provisions. However, the local legislation and the administrative legislation of all levels of government have different handling modes, which leads to the disunity of judicial practice in various places, and the phenomenon of "different compensation for the same destiny", which affects the unity and authority of the law. The study of the nature and the relationship between the claim for compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury caused by personal infringement, the determination of a unified treatment model and the full play of the functions of the various systems are not only conducive to the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of workers in our country. Stable and improve labor relations, but also conducive to China's socialist construction of the rule of law. Since the core of the theory of competing claims in the field of civil law is how to deal with a life event when it is evaluated by multiple legal norms, the achievements of the relevant theories of absorbing the theory of competing claim are used for reference. It is of great significance to study and deal with the relationship between the claim for compensation for injury insurance and the claim for compensation for personal tort. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is about the theory of concurrence of claim right and its inspiration to the concurrent processing of claim for compensation for injury insurance and compensation for personal tort. By introducing the main theories of appraising the concurrence of claim rights, this paper puts forward that the essence of competing claims right is the concurrence of legal norms, but the same life fact can only produce one claim right, not repeated evaluation. Furthermore, the author puts forward the inspiration of the theory of competing claims for the right of claim to compensation for industrial injury insurance and the claim for personal tort damages, that is, to solve the problem of two kinds of claims from the angle of legal norms and to prohibit repeated evaluation. Chapter two is about the concurrence of the claim right of industrial injury insurance and the claim right of personal tort. This chapter first analyzes the differences between the basis of claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the basis of claim for compensation for personal infringement from the development course of the system of compensation for industrial injury, and then from the subject of compensation obligation, the way of relief. Value orientation and other aspects of the analysis of the difference between the two claims. The third chapter is about the processing mode of the two kinds of claims. First of all, it introduces and evaluates the four modes of competing for two kinds of claims, that is, the choice mode, the substitution model, the concurrent mode and the supplementary mode, and then the legal norms. From three aspects of administrative legislation, local laws and regulations and the relevant provisions made by the Supreme Court, this paper analyzes the deficiencies in the handling of the two kinds of claims in the legislative practice of our country, and finally introduces and evaluates the views of Chinese scholars on the handling of the two kinds of claims. The fourth chapter is about the system establishment suggestion. This chapter is mainly to construct the system of solving the competing system of the claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal tort, and establish four principles of fairness, efficiency, full compensation and priority of compensation for industrial injury insurance. And put forward the idea of constructing the unified compensation system of industrial injury insurance with the right of recovery.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923;D922.5

【引证文献】