建筑工程多层转包下劳动关系的认定

发布时间：2018-07-17 18:47

【摘要】：认定劳动关系应当准确把握其内涵和外延。在建筑行业多层转包下多个主体之间劳动关系的认定上存在的分歧比较大,本文就建筑行业复杂的用人关系上分析劳动关系的认定标准,从正面探讨本案主体之间能否构成劳动关系;同时本文从雇佣关系的认定标准、雇佣关系与劳动关系的区分两个角度阐述劳动关系的认定问题,从侧面观察劳动关系的认定标准,通过概念比较的方式更能清晰地判断劳动关系的存在与否。本文的第一部分简单的介绍了案情内容,列举出法院所查明的主要客观事实,归纳案件的两个争议焦点。文章第二部分是案例评析,该部分主要介绍劳动关系的理论问题,其中包括事实劳动关系的理论问题;国内外认定劳动关系的主要标准;分析与劳动关系有关的法律法规;合意对于劳动关系认定的必要性。结合本案中法院所认定的事实,分析本案主体之间能否构成劳动关系。同时对雇佣关系的理论和雇佣关系与劳动关系的区别上分析主体之间的劳动关系是否成立。最终得出结论,争议双方均不构成任何法律关系。文章第三部分是思考与建议,依据前文所述,无论理论界还是实务界均对劳动关系的认定存有分歧,本文在从属性理论基础上,从提高立法文件的位阶、统一法律适用、完善责任机制三个方面给予法律保障,尤其是将“合意”被立法所吸收,作为认定劳动关系正式标准之一,进一步规范劳动关系的认定。
[Abstract]:The determination of labor relations should accurately grasp its connotation and extension. There is a big difference in the identification of labor relations between different subjects under the multi-story subcontracting of the construction industry. This paper analyzes the identification standard of labor relations on the complex employment relationship in the construction industry. At the same time, this paper expounds the identification of labor relations from the standards of employment relations, the distinction between employment relations and labor relations. Observing the standards of labor relations from the side, we can clearly judge the existence or not of labor relations by means of conceptual comparison. The first part of this paper briefly introduces the content of the case, enumerates the main objective facts identified by the court, and summarizes the two controversial focuses of the case. The second part of the article is case analysis, this part mainly introduces the theoretical issues of labor relations, including the theoretical issues of factual labor relations, the main standards for the identification of labor relations at home and abroad, the analysis of laws and regulations related to labor relations; The necessity of consensual determination of labor relations. According to the facts found by the court in this case, this paper analyzes whether the labor relationship can be formed between the subjects of this case. At the same time, the theory of employment relation and the difference between employment relation and labor relation are analyzed. It was concluded that neither of the parties to the dispute constituted any legal relationship. The third part of the article is thinking and suggestions, according to the above mentioned, both theoretical and practical circles have differences on the identification of labor relations. This paper unifies the application of the law on the basis of attribute theory and improving the rank of legislative documents. Perfect the responsibility mechanism to give the legal protection in three aspects, especially the "agreement" is absorbed by the legislation, as one of the formal standards of confirming the labor relations, further standardizing the determination of the labor relations.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D920.5;D922.5

【相似文献】