平等就业权的民事司法救济研究

发布时间：2018-11-21 08:36

【摘要】：就业是民生之本，是安邦之策；平等就业是现代社会平等价值的一个极其重要内容，是保障人的基本权利的根本途径。然而，在目前存在着就业不力与就业不平等的双重困局。其中，就业不平等所导致的负面影响和破坏力是全局性的，远比我们想象的要严重，，就业不平等是当前社会不平等的一个最为突出的表现。随着“和谐社会”、“执政为民”、“以人为本”与“科学发展观”等理念的兴起，全体劳动者公平分享改革发展成果，已经成为一种广泛的社会共识，而平等就业则是实现这个基本目标的根本途径。正是从该意义上讲，平等就业权，这个既具有朴素的平民情节，又关系到职场的民主化、多样性和机会均等等具有社会正义性质和法律意义的重大课题，就不再是一个简单的权利宣示，而是一种积极的权利主张，是广大劳动者的一个最普遍的利益诉求。本文通过类型化的方法、比较研究的方法、语义分析的方法和规范分析的方法从三个方面对平等就业权的司法救济进行了研究。第一部分，对平等就业权的概念、现状、救济的意义进行了研究。第二部分，对平等就业权救济过程中涉及的实体法问题进行了研究，主要内容包括：权利主体范围、歧视的定义与标准以及相关法律责任。第三部分，从程序法方面对平等就业权的司法救济进行了研究，主要内容包括：立案审查制度、主体适格问题和举证责任问题。笔者认为，要改变平等就业权现状在实体法方面需要制定《反就业歧视法》，在程序方面应当改革现行立案审查制度，并针对平等就业权的特殊性制定相应的举证责任分配制度。
[Abstract]:Employment is the foundation of people's livelihood and the policy of Anbang, and equal employment is an extremely important content of equal value in modern society and a fundamental way to guarantee the basic rights of human beings. However, at present, there is a double dilemma of poor employment and employment inequality. Among them, the negative impact and destructive force caused by the employment inequality is overall, far more serious than we thought, the employment inequality is the most prominent manifestation of the current social inequality. With the rise of the concepts of "harmonious society", "ruling for the people", "people-oriented" and "scientific development view", it has become a widespread social consensus that all workers share the fruits of reform and development fairly. And equal employment is the basic way to achieve this basic goal. It is in this sense that the right to equality in employment, which is both a simple civilian scenario and a major issue of social justice and legal significance, is related to the democratization, diversity and equality of opportunity in the workplace. It is no longer a simple declaration of rights, but a positive claim, which is the most common interest demand of the broad masses of workers. This paper studies the judicial remedy of equal employment right from three aspects: the method of typology, the method of comparative study, the method of semantic analysis and the method of normative analysis. The first part, the concept of equal employment right, the status quo, the significance of relief are studied. In the second part, the author studies the substantive law issues involved in the relief process of equal employment right, including the scope of the right subject, the definition and standard of discrimination and the related legal liability. The third part studies the judicial remedy of equal employment right from the aspect of procedural law. The main contents include: the system of filing and examination, the problem of subject's suitability and the problem of burden of proof. The author thinks that in order to change the status quo of equal employment right, we need to make the Anti-Employment Discrimination Law in the aspect of substantive law, and reform the current filing and examining system in the aspect of procedure. According to the particularity of equal right to employment, the distribution system of burden of proof is established.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D922.5

【参考文献】