连带债务成立规范之逻辑结构

发布时间：2017-12-27 06:32

本文关键词：连带债务成立规范之逻辑结构　出处：《海峡法学》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：数债务是否基于同一原因而发生?数债务人中之一人是否负有最终责任,均无法用以区别连带债务与不真正连带债务,反而将应是连带债务者评价为不真正连带债务。在连带债务以当事人明示或法律规定为发生要件之脉络下,这项评价矛盾,将显得更尖锐。不仅当事人出于担保债权的目的,而约定连带债务,立法者亦考量到,的确存在着担保债权实现之需求,而制定法定连带责任。连带债务成立规范逻辑结构,乃数债务间存在着担保债权实现之需求,是以规范设计上,势必以同一给付目的、各付全部给付之责作为连带债务之发生要件;以债权人得向各债务人请求全部给付作为法律效果。如此之规范设计,方处在理性之结构之中。
[Abstract]:Whether the number of debts is based on the same reason? Whether one of the debtors bears the ultimate responsibility can not be used to distinguish the joint and several liabilities and the unreal joint and several liabilities. Instead, it should be the joint and several debtors to evaluate the unreal joint and several liabilities. This contradiction will be more acute in the context of the joint and several obligations of the parties or the legal provisions of the parties. Not only the parties agree on the joint and several liabilities for the purpose of secured creditor, but also the legislators consider that there is a demand for guaranteed creditor's rights and a statutory joint and several liability is established. Joint debt up to regulate the logical structure, but the number of debt between the demand secured creditor, is to regulate the design, is bound to the same purpose of payment, pay full payment of duty as the elements of joint debt; the creditor to the debtor for all payment as the legal effect. Such a standard design is in the structure of reason.
【作者单位】：台北大学法律学系;
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 一、问题提出与背景台湾地区“民法”第184条第1项前段规定:“因故意或过失,不法侵害他人之权利者,负损害赔偿责任。”关于这条规定之逻辑结构,包括命令(Imperativtheorie)结构与规定(Bestimmungstheorie)结构,(1)简要说明如下:其一,立法者以损害作为构成要件,以损害赔偿义

【相似文献】