视听作品著作权归属及利益分配问题探析

发布时间：2018-01-19 05:24

本文关键词： 视听作品著作权权利主体著作权权益分配送审稿　出处：《中国政法大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：视听作品作为一种综合性的艺术表现形式,其创作经常需要大量的投资,并且创作班底呈现出数量庞大、成分复杂的特点,因此视听作品创作者的认定一直是其著作权制度存在争议的问题之一。同时,由于视听作品的创作可能涉及对在先作品的使用,我国现行《著作权法》中却并没有明确使用在先作品创作的视听作品与原作品之间的关系,从而导致实践中原作作者与视听作品著作权人之间著作权利益关系的混乱。随着视听文化产业的不断发展,视听作品的版权交易形式不断丰富,对视听作品衍生的利益分配问题逐渐成为制约我国视听产业进一步发展的矛盾。我国现行《著作权法》对于上述问题缺乏明确的规定,无法妥善调解实践中产生的矛盾,正值我国《著作权法》第三次修改之际,立法者对于视听作品著作权制度进行了大胆的重构。本文试图通过对国外有代表性的法律规定、相关国际条约、案例进行分析、比较,同时结合《著作权法》修订草案的三稿征求意见稿以及送审稿中条文的更迭加以研究,以期能够较为透彻地理解围绕视听作品的著作权法律关系,并对我国此次《著作权法》修订的内容作出客观合理评价的基础上提出有价值的建议。第一章为视听作品概论,就视听作品的内涵、外延以及受保护的一般要件进行阐述。送审稿中正式引入了视听作品这一术语统一涵盖电影作品、以类似摄制电影的方法创作的作品和录像制品。笔者就此更改作出了评论和分析。第二章主要论述视听作品可能涉及的著作权主体以及各主体之间对视听作品著作权权利的初次分配问题。包括制片者与创作作者的认定、可单独使用作品的著作权行使方式、作者精神权利的保障等问题。送审稿对视听作品著作权的初次分配也作出修改,将原先法定授予制片者的经济权利变更为可由合同约定。第三章就所谓的“二次获酬权”制度进行分析,立法者意欲在中国引入类似的利益分享制度却遭到制片者利益团体的强烈抵制,最终送审稿中采取了更加折衷式的条文,笔者在分析比较代表性立法方式的基础上对送审稿的规定以及在我国实施利益分享制度的优势和不足之处作出评析。第四章是总结性章节,主要对此次修订中对视听作品著作权制度作出的重构进行总结和分析。笔者首先阐述了制度重构的理论基础,并针对修订草案征求意见稿以及送审稿中就法律概念的厘清、权利主体的认定、视听作品著作权权益的初次分配和二次分配作出的规定进行评析。
[Abstract]:Audiovisual works as a comprehensive form of artistic expression, its creation often requires a large amount of investment, and the creation class presents a large number of complex composition characteristics. Therefore, the identification of the authors of audio-visual works has always been one of the controversial issues in their copyright system. At the same time, the creation of audio-visual works may involve the use of previous works. In the present copyright Law of China, however, there is no clear relationship between the audio-visual works created by the previous works and the original works. This leads to the confusion of the relationship between the copyright interests of the original author and the copyright owner of audio-visual works in practice. With the continuous development of audio-visual cultural industry, the form of copyright transaction of audio-visual works is constantly rich. The distribution of interests derived from audiovisual works has gradually become a contradiction that restricts the further development of audiovisual industry in China. The contradiction which can not be properly conciliated in practice is at the time of the third revision of the copyright Law of our country. The legislator has carried on the bold reconstruction to the audio-visual work copyright system. This article attempts to carry on the analysis, the comparison through the foreign representative law stipulation, the correlation international treaty, the case analysis. At the same time combined with the "copyright Law" revised draft of the three drafts of the draft to solicit comments and draft for review of the provisions of the change to be studied, in order to be able to understand more thoroughly the legal relationship around the copyright of audio-visual works. And on the basis of the objective and reasonable evaluation of the contents of the revision of the copyright Law in China, some valuable suggestions are put forward. The first chapter is an overview of audio-visual works, the connotation of audio-visual works. The extension and the general elements of protection are elaborated. The term audio-visual works is formally introduced in the draft submission to cover film works in a unified way. Works and videos created in a movie-like way. The author makes comments and analyses on the changes. Chapter two mainly deals with the possible copyright subjects involved in audiovisual works and their works on audiovisual works. The first assignment of the right of copyright, including the identification of the producer and the author. The ways to exercise the copyright of the works and the protection of the author's mental rights can be used separately. The initial distribution of the copyright of the audio-visual works is also modified by the draft submitted for trial. Change the economic rights of the original statutory conferring producer to contractual agreement. Chapter III analyzes the so-called "right to second pay" system. Lawmakers' desire to introduce similar benefit-sharing systems in China was strongly resisted by filmmakers' interest groups, and a more eclectic version was adopted in the final draft submission. On the basis of analyzing and comparing the representative legislative methods, the author comments on the provisions of draft submission and the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the benefit-sharing system in China. Chapter 4th is a concluding chapter. The author summarizes and analyzes the reconstruction of the copyright system of audio-visual works in this revision. Firstly, the author expounds the theoretical basis of the system reconstruction. It also comments on the provisions of the revised draft, including the clarification of the legal concept, the determination of the subject of the right, the initial distribution and the secondary distribution of the rights and interests of the audio-visual works.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】