论指示交付下的善意取得

发布时间：2018-01-21 22:13

本文关键词： 指示交付善意取得区分理论返还原物请求权　出处：《东南学术》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：指示交付中的转让返还请求权协议并非物权行为理论下的"处分行为",而仍属合同范畴。在以指示交付进行无权处分的场合中,处分人向相对人让与的返还请求权是债权请求权,应适用债权让与规则。《买卖合同司法解释》第3条确立了无权处分合同有效的规则,基于体系强制和价值判断的实体性论证,债权让与合同的效力同样不受无权处分影响,转让返还请求权协议亦然。而在转让人不是标的物的间接占有人的情况下,受让人并不能因转让返还请求权协议生效而取得返还请求权,也就未能满足善意取得的"交付"要件。因此,对于《物权法司法解释(一)》第18条"转让人与受让人之间有关转让返还原物请求权的协议生效时为动产交付之时"的规定,应作目的性限缩,将"转让人不是动产的间接占有人"这一情形排除在外。
[Abstract]:The agreement of transfer and return claim in the direction delivery is not the disposition act under the real right act theory, but still belongs to the contract category. The right to return the disposition to the relative party is the claim of creditor's right, and the rule of assignment of creditor's rights should be applied. Article 3 of the Judicial interpretation of the contract of sale and purchase establishes the rules of validity of the contract of unauthorized disposition. Based on the substantive argument of system compulsion and value judgment, the validity of the contract of assignment of creditor's rights is also not affected by unauthorized disposition. Where the assignor is not the indirect possessor of the subject-matter, the assignee cannot obtain the restitution claim by virtue of the validity of the agreement on the transfer of the restitution claim. Thus, the "delivery" element obtained in good faith is not satisfied. Article 18 of the Judicial interpretation of property Law (1) "the agreement between the assignor and the assignee concerning the transfer of the claim for the return of the original property shall be the time of the delivery of movable property when the agreement on the transfer of the claim for return of the original property becomes effective", which should be restricted purposefully. Exclude the situation that the assignor is not an indirect possessor of movable property.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科学研究业务费专项资金资助)项目“指示交付适用善意取得制度问题研究——以区分理论的体系效应为视角”(项目编号:17XNH010)
【分类号】：D923.2
【正文快照】： (1)例如,最高人民法院在(2010)民四终字第20号判决书中,以及天津市高级人民法院在(2015)津高民四终字第77号判决书中,均明确认为,对于指示交付中完成交付的时间点,应比照《担保法司法解释》第88条“出质人以间接占有的财产出质的,质押合同自书面通知送达占有人时视为移交”之

【相似文献】