专利纠纷行政调解制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-22 06:28

本文关键词： 专利纠纷行政调解非诉解决　出处：《湘潭大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：专利纠纷行政调解是行政机关为解决专利纠纷所提供的服务行为,其实质上体现了现代服务行政的理念,有利于实现政府服务人民的宗旨和社会纠纷的和谐解决。近年来,国家加强了对侵害专利权的执法和处罚力度,专利侵权行为得到有效遏制,初步构建了较为公平的社会主义市场经济环境,为创新型国家建设提供更有力的支撑和保障。伴随着专利制度的发展,专利侵权纠纷不断增加,目前,我国构建了以司法审判为主体,兼多元非诉解决途径为辅的纠纷解决机制。专利纠纷具有独占性、时效性、地域性等特点,相比于其他专利纠纷非诉解决途径,专利纠纷行政调解能快速解决纠纷,节约司法资源,实现双方合作共赢。专利侵权纠纷不断上升,而专利行政调解制度并未发挥其应有的社会效应,调解行为界定模糊,调解范围狭小,调解书无法成为执行依据是主要原因,导致这一现状是由于我国专利纠纷行政调解制度缺乏顶层设计,行政机构主持调解机构定位不明确以及缺乏司法对接程序。就其他国家而言,英国专利纠纷行政调解主要借鉴于建设服务型机构的理念,构建了一整套完善的专利纠纷行政调解制度,而日本则采用了双轨制的专利纠纷调解机构,利用公共资源,提供了廉价的专利纠纷行政调解机制,德国的发明专利纠纷行政调解采用调解前置程序,要求必须在专利局进行调解后方能起诉,这些举措给我国专利纠纷行政调解制度的改进以裨益。针对我国专利纠纷行政调解制度存在诸多问题,应从思想理念上将专利细分和类型化,以构建服务型政府为中心思想,辅以博弈论的视角,推进纠纷的化解,构建一整套完善的专利纠纷行政调解机制,规定意思自治、公平中立和保密性原则,在人员选任上采取严格标准,并应符合调解人员有利于解决纠纷的要求,建立专利纠纷行政调解文书司法确认制度和案外第三人撤销制度。
[Abstract]:Administrative mediation of patent disputes is the service provided by administrative organs to solve patent disputes, which embodies the concept of modern service administration in essence. In recent years, the government has strengthened the enforcement and punishment of patent infringement, and patent infringement has been effectively curbed. Initially constructed a more fair socialist market economy environment for the construction of an innovative country to provide more effective support and protection. With the development of the patent system patent infringement disputes continue to increase at present. China has constructed a dispute resolution mechanism with judicial trial as the main body and multiple non-litigation solutions as the supplement. Patent disputes have the characteristics of exclusivity, timeliness, regionality and so on, compared with other patent dispute non-litigation solutions. Administrative mediation of patent disputes can quickly resolve disputes, save judicial resources, achieve win-win cooperation between the two sides. Patent infringement disputes continue to rise, and patent administrative mediation system has not played its due social effect. The main reason is that the definition of mediation behavior is vague, the scope of mediation is narrow, and the mediation document can not be the basis for implementation, which leads to the lack of top-level design of administrative mediation system for patent disputes in China. As for other countries, administrative mediation of British patent disputes mainly draws lessons from the concept of building service-oriented institutions. Build a set of perfect patent dispute administrative mediation system, while Japan has adopted a two-track patent dispute mediation institutions, using public resources, to provide a cheap administrative mediation mechanism for patent disputes. The administrative mediation of invention patent disputes in Germany adopts the pre-mediation procedure, which requires that only after the mediation of the patent office can the lawsuit be brought. These measures are beneficial to the improvement of the administrative mediation system of patent disputes in China. In view of the problems in the administrative mediation system of patent disputes in China, the patent should be subdivided and classified from the perspective of ideology and concept. To build a service-oriented government as the central idea, supplemented by the perspective of game theory, to promote the resolution of disputes, build a complete set of patent dispute administrative mediation mechanism, the autonomy of will, fairness, neutrality and confidentiality principles. To adopt strict standards in personnel selection and appointment, and to meet the requirements of mediation personnel in favor of resolving disputes, establish the system of judicial confirmation of administrative mediation documents for patent disputes and the system of revocation of third parties outside the case.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】