评析三个民法总则草案中的平等规定——从平等撤退的端倪以及可能的发展

发布时间：2018-01-22 13:54

本文关键词： 平等民法总则草案权利能力屈从关系法律地位商品交换的平等观　出处：《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》催生出了三大民法总则草案的公布,它们中的两个都规定了包含"平等主体"限定的民法对象定义、平等原则、自然人权利能力一律平等的规则,一个只规定了平等原则和自然人权利能力一律平等的规则,三者共同体现了社会主义国家的民法学对平等的热爱。实际上,"平等主体"的限定只能适用于基于等量劳动的交换,却被扩张适用于整个民法,是以偏概全的方法论错误的结果。平等原则和自然人权利能力一律平等的规则一旦经受个别性还原,就谬误尽显。尽管如此,我国民法学界已开始从对平等的热爱退却,表现为一个民法总则草案放弃了"平等主体"的限定,以及另一个民法总则草案为平等原则设立了以屈从关系为内容的但书。
[Abstract]:The "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively promoting governing the country according to Law" gave birth to the publication of the draft general principles of the three major civil laws.All of them set out a definition of the object of civil law containing the qualification of "equal subject." The principle of equality, the rule of equality of capacity of natural persons, a rule that stipulates only the principle of equality and the equality of capacity of natural persons. In fact, the limitation of "equal subject" can only be applied to the exchange based on equal amount of labor, but it is expanded to apply to the whole civil law. The principle of equality and the rule of equality of natural persons' rights and capacity to be equal, once they have been reduced individually, the fallacy becomes obvious. The academic circle of civil law in our country has begun to retreat from the love of equality, which shows that a draft draft of the general principles of civil law has given up the qualification of "equal subject". And another general draft of civil law establishes a proviso to the principle of equality.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 一、序言2014年10月30日的《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》提出,加强市场法律制度建设,编纂民法典。这一规划让制定中国民法典的进程走出了低谷,引发了各相关方的积极行动。首先,中国法学会民法典编纂项目领导小组于2015年4月19日在法学创新网公布了中国

【参考文献】