指导性案例裁判要点不能背离原案事实——对最高人民法院指导案例67号的评论与展望

发布时间：2018-01-22 14:08

本文关键词： 指导性案例裁判要点案件事实股权转让合同解除权分期付款买卖　出处：《政治与法律》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：最高人民法院指导案例67号"汤长龙诉周士海股权转让纠纷案"试图确立有限责任公司股权分期付款转让协议在受让人逾期付款金额达到五分之一的,不适用我国《合同法》第167条合同解除权规定的裁判规则。其中蕴含着民商法分立思路中商事组织法上交易不同于合同法上交易(尤其是消费合同关系)的商事裁判理念。不过,该案本身没有涉及股权这一特殊标的物转让协议守约方合同解除权限制问题,三级法院裁判文书也未反映相关事实及法律争议。指导性案例裁判要点应当准确归纳提炼原案裁判文书本意,而不能背离原案事实任意发挥创造新的规则,这样才能够确保指导性案例的制度价值及应有权威。
[Abstract]:The Supreme people's Court instructs the case No. 67 Tang Changlong v. Zhou Shihai equity transfer dispute case to try to establish a limited liability company equity installment transfer agreement in the transferee overdue payment amount of 1/5. It does not apply to the judgment rules of the right to rescind the contract stipulated in Article 167 of the contract Law of China, which contains the idea of separation of civil and commercial law, in which the transaction in the law of commercial law is different from that in the contract law (especially in the relationship of consumer contract). Of commercial judgment. But... The case itself does not deal with the restriction of the right of rescission of the contract of the conformant to the assignment agreement on the special subject matter equity. Three levels of court decision documents also do not reflect the relevant facts and legal disputes. Guiding cases adjudication should be accurately summarized and refined the original text of the original document, and can not deviate from the facts of the original case to create new rules at will. Only in this way can the institutional value and authority of the guiding cases be ensured.
【作者单位】：南京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D923.6
【正文快照】： 一、问题的提出从2011年指导性案例制度正式实施至2017年6月底,最高人民法院陆续发布16批87个指导性案例,(1)商事指导性案例在其中占有相当比例。当然也有学者经统计分析得出商事指导性案例数量偏少比例不高的结论。(2)笔者认为,这也许是口径不同使然。最高人民法院设有一套

【相似文献】