当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

药品侵权案例中的因果关系认定

发布时间:2018-01-25 05:53

  本文关键词: 药品侵权 因果关系 推定因果关系 出处:《东南大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:近几年来,人民法院受理的药品侵权诉讼案件逐渐增多。由于药品固有的危险,使得药品区别与其它的一些产品。药品致害机理复杂,具有时间的消长性,致病因素的复杂性,举证的专业技术性。这些都是药品侵权案件中因果关系的认定困难的原因。因此,各国发展了许多特殊的证明方法,为受害者寻求救济途径提供了可能性。目前,在立法上,我国还没有制定专门的《药品责任法》来保护药品侵权的受害者。在司法上,由于药品侵权举证责任分配的困难,受害者往往承担败诉的风险。并且,由于因果关系的证明标准不统一,各地法院同案不同判的情况也时常发生。为了维护受害者的合法权益,维护公平正义,本文对完善药品侵权中的因果关系认定提出了思考。本文从案例中引出药品侵权诉讼中因果关系的特殊性,并分析了其他国家的因果关系认定的经验。在立法上提出了制定专门的《药品责任法》的建议,在司法上提出了举证责任倒置规则的想法,最后本文还借鉴国外的因果关系认定理论分析我国药品侵权诉讼案件的不足,以更好的保护我国药品侵权诉讼中的受害者。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the people's court has gradually increased the number of cases of drug infringement litigation. Because of the inherent dangers of drugs, the difference between drugs and some other products. The mechanism of drug harm is complex, with the time of growth and decline. The complexity of pathogenic factors and the professional technology of proof are all the reasons for the difficulty of identifying causality in drug infringement cases. Therefore, many countries have developed many special methods of proof. At present, our country has not formulated a special Drug liability Law to protect the victims of drug infringement. Because of the difficulty of distributing the burden of proof in drug infringement, the victim often bears the risk of losing the lawsuit. Moreover, the standard of proof of causality is not uniform. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victims and to safeguard the fairness and justice, the different judgments of the local courts also occur from time to time. This paper puts forward some thoughts on how to perfect the causality in drug infringement. This paper leads to the particularity of causality in drug tort litigation. It also analyzes the experience of causality in other countries. In legislation, the author puts forward the suggestion of making a special "Drug liability Law", and puts forward the idea of putting forward the rule of reversing the burden of proof in judicature. Finally, this paper also uses the theory of causality in foreign countries to analyze the shortcomings of drug tort litigation cases in China, in order to better protect the victims of drug infringement litigation in China.
【学位授予单位】:东南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 郭彩;;证券侵权责任因果关系认定的再认识——兼论因果关系推定理论的适用[J];法制与社会;2011年03期

2 刘春宝;李静;;渎职犯罪案件中因果关系认定问题[J];党史博采(理论);2011年03期

3 杜晓溪;高崇慧;;侵权法因果关系认定规则研究[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2008年02期

4 陈丹;王彬;;瑕疵建筑物因外力致人损害的因果关系认定[J];经济研究导刊;2009年03期

5 张雅洁;;过失侵权的因果关系认定[J];南方论刊;2010年02期

6 崔军勇,李洪军;对侵犯生命健康权案件中因果关系认定之分析[J];延边党校学报;2004年03期

7 杨秀朝;构建我国因果关系认定模式之探讨[J];经济与社会发展;2003年02期

8 刘燕;梁p煵,

本文编号:1462173


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1462173.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户54930***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com