法人名誉权保护中的利益平衡

发布时间：2018-02-01 14:20

本文关键词： 法人名誉权消费者诉求舆论监督权网络言论自由商业言论自由　出处：《法学家》2015年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：法人名誉权往往与言论自由权、舆论监督权等相互冲突,如何实现这些权利之间的平衡是实践中法人名誉权保护的难题。在消费者表达诉求的侵权认定中,应对行为的过错程度和违法性进行认定,采用推定的方式判断名誉损害事实的存在,并应当体现保护弱者的司法理念。在媒体侵权认定中,应考察其出发点是否为了公共利益的需要,内容是否基本真实,不得对法人名誉故意丑化、侮辱,还应积极履行真实查证义务。在网络侵权案件中,要注重对网络言论自由权的维护,同时严厉打击恶意诽谤、造谣行为。针对竞争对手侵权,明确商业言论自由及其行使界限,避免名誉权诉讼被滥用,对商业竞争者之间的诋毁行为应当施加较重的责任,以健全市场机制。
[Abstract]:The right of reputation of legal person often conflicts with the right of freedom of speech and the right of supervision of public opinion. How to realize the balance between these rights is a difficult problem to protect the right of reputation of legal person in practice. We should identify the degree of fault and illegality of the act, judge the existence of the fact of reputation damage by the way of presumption, and should embody the judicial idea of protecting the weak. We should investigate whether the starting point is for the needs of the public interest, whether the content is basically true, not intentionally uglify and insult the reputation of legal persons, but also actively fulfill the obligation to verify truthfulness. We should pay attention to the protection of the right to freedom of expression on the Internet, at the same time severely crack down on malicious libel and disinformation activities. In view of the infringement of competitors, clear the limits of freedom of commercial expression and its exercise, and avoid abuse of reputation litigation. Heavy liability should be placed on commercial competitors for defamation in order to improve market mechanisms.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学;
【基金】：教育部新世纪优秀人才计划中央高校基本科研业务经费专项资金资助
【分类号】：D923
【正文快照】： 张红,法学博士,中南财经政法大学教授。问题的提出《民法通则》第101条规定:"公民、法人享有名誉权,公民的人格尊严受法律保护,禁止用侮辱、诽谤等方式损害公民、法人的名誉。”但对法人名誉权,往往参照自然人名誉权予以保护。?基于法人不同于自然人的特殊性,准用式的法律规定

【参考文献】