机器写手生成内容的著作权问题研究

发布时间：2018-02-01 15:24

本文关键词： 机器写手作品著作权归属侵权责任　出处：《湘潭大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着科学技术的发展,人类从繁重的体力与脑力劳动中得以解放出来,其中机器写手将人类从某些领域的脑力劳动中解放出来。机器写手目前主要应用在文学领域、艺术领域。随着机器写手在越来越多的领域内频繁“上岗”,对机器写手及其创作成果进行研究实属必要。机器写手创作成果的相关著作权问题中,首要问题当属机器写手的创作成果是否为受著作权法保护的作品。根据机器写手的工作模式,机器写手创作成果可分成不受《著作权法》保护的成果和受《著作权法》所保护的作品这两类:机器写手独立进行创作不能产生受《著作权法》所保护的作品,只有人参与创作的过程才能产生受《著作权法》保护的作品。其创作构成受《著作权法》保护的作品时,机器写手往往仅在其中起辅助作用。机器写手不能作为法律上的主体,其参与创作的受著作权法保护的作品的权利归属,当属于参与创作的人——软件使用者或软件开发者,这两类主体对作品创作的贡献不等,结合机器写手的具体应用,可知软件使用者对作品创作做出的贡献要比软件开发者大,且依据知识产权制度的利益平衡原则,软件使用者的利益更需要保护,因此机器写手创作的作品,其著作权归属于软件使用者更为适合。根据机器写手的工作模式,其所具有的抓取能力是有侵权可能性的。机器写手既有可能侵犯著作财产权也有可能侵犯著作人身权。机器写手在创作中所起到的作用,决定了其侵权责任的承担:如果机器写手独立创作的成果侵权,软件开发者责无旁贷。从机器写手的功能来看,如果机器写手只有单纯的侵权功能,那么软件开发者承担间接侵权责任,软件使用者承担直接侵权责任;如果机器写手并非只有单一的侵权功能,软件开发者可以以技术中立原则免责,而软件使用者需要承担侵权责任。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, human beings have been liberated from heavy physical and mental labor. Machine writers liberate human beings from some fields of mental labor. Machine writers are mainly used in the field of literature and art. With the increasing number of machine writers in more and more fields of "work". It is necessary to study the machine writers and their creative achievements. The first question is whether the product of the machine writer is a work protected by copyright law. According to the working mode of the machine writer. The achievements of machine writers can be divided into two categories: the works which are not protected by the copyright Law and the works which are protected by the copyright Law: the machine writers can not produce the works protected by the copyright Law by themselves. Only people participate in the process of creation can produce the works protected by the copyright Law, and when their creation constitutes the works protected by the copyright Law. Machine writers often only play an auxiliary role. Machine writers can not be the subject of law, and their rights to participate in the creation of works protected by copyright law belong. When the person involved in the creation-software users or software developers, these two main contributions to the creation of works vary, combined with the specific application of machine writers. We know that software users make a greater contribution to the creation of works than software developers, and according to the interests of the intellectual property system balance principle, the interests of software users need more protection, so machine writers create works. Its copyright belongs to the software user more suitable. According to the machine writer's work mode. The grabbing ability has the possibility of infringement. The machine writer has both the possibility to infringe the property right and the personal right of the work. The role of the machine writer in the creation. Decided its tort liability: if the machine writer independent creation of the product infringement, the software developer is duty-bound. From the machine writer's function, if the machine writer only has the infringing function. Then the software developer bears the indirect tort liability, the software user bears the direct tort liability; If the machine writer does not have a single infringing function, the software developer can be exempted from liability under the principle of technology neutrality, and the software user is liable for the infringement.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】