司法解释对善意取得制度完善的影响度

发布时间：2018-02-03 14:39

本文关键词： 司法解释善意取得影响度法释[]号价格合理原因行为有效　出处：《华东政法大学学报》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：编纂民法典有必要吸收已被证明是适当的司法解释,排除不尽合适的规则。法释[2016]5号把善意界定为受让人不知道转让人无处分权,且无重大过失的状态,将证明受让人非善意的举证责任分配给了真实的权利人;同时它暗含着受让人负有查阅不动产登记簿的义务,不查阅便签订买卖合同,在让与人非为不动产登记簿记载的权利人的情况下,受让人具有重大过失,算不上不动产善意取得构成要件中的善意。这值得肯定,编纂民法典应当采纳这种思想。法释[2016]5号不区分动产物权与不动产物权而对受让人有无重大过失的判断采取统一的标准,则值得商榷,编纂民法典不宜采纳这种判断标准。在动产物权变动的场合,受让人是否存在重大过失的判断因素应多于不动产物权变动的场合。法释[2016]5号对价格合理与否的认定采取客观等值性原则,编纂民法典时对此应予吸纳。法释[2016]5号坚持原因行为无效、被撤销时不发生善意取得,这是混淆善意取得与物权保有两个阶段事情的表现,编纂民法典不宜采取这种观点。
[Abstract]:It is necessary to codify the Civil Code by absorbing the judicial interpretation that has been proved to be appropriate and by excluding the unsuitable rules. [(2016) 5 defines bona fide as a state in which the assignee does not know that the assignor has no place to decentralize and is free of gross negligence, and assigns the burden of proof to the true holder of the right to prove that the assignee is not bona fide; At the same time, it implies that the transferee has the obligation to consult the register of immovable property and sign the contract of sale without consulting it. In the case that the transferor is not the holder of the right recorded in the register of immovable property, the transferee has gross negligence. It is not the bona fide in the constitutive elements of bona fide acquisition of immovable property. This is to be affirmed. This idea should be adopted in the codification of the civil code. [5. It is debatable that No. 5 does not distinguish between movable and immovable property rights and adopts a unified standard for judging whether the transferee is guilty of gross negligence. It is not appropriate to adopt this standard of judgment in the codification of civil code. In the case of alteration of movable property right, the judgment factor of transferee's gross negligence should be more than that of immovable property right change. [5. The principle of objective equivalence is adopted in the determination of reasonable price, which should be taken into account when codifying the Civil Code. [No. 5 insists that the reason act is invalid and the bona fide acquisition does not occur when it is revoked, which is a manifestation of confusing the two stages of bona fide acquisition and real right retention, which should not be adopted in the codification of the Civil Code.
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“法学方法论与中国民商法研究”(项目号13AZD065) 清华大学自主科研计划课题“中国民法典编纂重大理论问题研究”(项目号2015THZWJC01)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D923.2
【正文快照】： 目次一、总的精神二、善意的含义及其判断三、《民法典·物权编》如何对待交易价格? 四、转让合同有效无效不应是善意取得的构成要件一、总的精神编纂《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称为《民法典》),包括《中华人民共和国民法典·物权编》(以下简称为《民法典·

【相似文献】