论允诺的效力体系

发布时间：2018-02-09 07:38

本文关键词： 合意允诺单方允诺之债单方契约效力体系　出处：《法商研究》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：允诺在《中华人民共和国民法总则》和《中华人民共和国合同法》中定位偏离且规定不足,作为债的中心议题未获得体系性展开。允诺的多义性既展现为对公众允诺等形式的法定单方允诺之债,又含有信赖保证之意充当债法领域的价值基础,形式上多体现为单方契约行为。对允诺效力的论证从"原因要素"过渡到一种"纯粹理性的公设"后,允诺的拒绝和接受等问题均应予以形式化或法定化,并辅以"合意合同与允诺"的区分模式来修正"合同与单方允诺之债"的二元结构。我国民法典一方面应围绕"单方合同中的允诺"完善债务免除、单方保证等5类针对特定人具有法效的规则体系,另一方面应补充"契约范式外"的法定允诺形式和内容,以多元形式完善债的发生根据。
[Abstract]:The promise deviates from and is inadequate in the General principles of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China and the contract Law of the people's Republic of China. The central issue of debt has not been carried out systematically. The polysemy of promise not only shows the obligation of legal unilateral promise to the public, but also contains the meaning of trust guarantee to serve as the value base in the field of debt law. In the form of unilateral contract behavior, the demonstration of the validity of the promise should be formalized or legalized after the argument of the validity of the promise is transferred from the "factor of reason" to the "pure rational public postulate", such as the refusal and acceptance of the promise, etc. The dual structure of "contract and obligation of unilateral promise" is modified by the distinguishing mode of "consensual contract and promise". On the one hand, the civil code of our country should perfect debt relief around "promise in unilateral contract". On the other hand, it should supplement the form and content of the legal promise outside the contract paradigm and perfect the basis of the debt in multiple forms.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大项目(14ZDC018)
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】