垄断行业中消费者公益诉讼研究

发布时间：2018-02-12 11:30

本文关键词： 消费者权益保护法消费者公益诉讼反垄断司法制度原告资格　出处：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着市场经济的发展,政府在坚持市场自动调节第一性的基础上,不仅在市场经济宏观领域的调控,还是微观领域对各市场主体的规制,对经济领域的法制建设与监督愈发重视。各类市场法律关系主体也意识到涉及自身相关利益的立法的重要性,需要相关法律来规制一些市场主体的行为,保护自己的合法权益,《反垄断法》即是要通过立法来限制垄断带来的危害,发挥市场竞争的优势,繁荣经济。但在我国电信、石化、铁路运输、电力运输、烟草等领域国家由国家独占经营,在公用事业领域通过行政协议允许水务、市政、城市公交、出租车等行业在一些地区进行垄断,我们可以看出这些行业与我们每个国民都息息相关,也必然会存在各类纷争,但由于这些行业其自身的特殊性,国家难以依据反垄断法进行自发的监管,而公民自身提起诉讼的成本相对于纠纷本身所代表的利益又过于高昂。在这样的背景下就需要一个社会组织—即消费者协会来承担这一社会责任,从而维护广大消费者权益,监督垄断领域的提供产品的一方市场行为,为建立有序健康的市场经济作出贡献。然而垄断行业提起消费者公益诉讼,不仅需要有相应的理论架构,还要有一整套法律程序来保证其行之有效,同时需要实际的案例去论证其可行性,这样才可以使消费者权益保护有法可依。本文运用了比较分析方法和实证研究的方法,在正文部分通过对垄断行业与反垄断法进行经济学分析与法律分析,并且探究世界范围内消费者公益诉讼的现状与有关司法制度,还有对相关消费者公益诉讼的案例进行讨论,以此来提出我国消费者公益诉讼在垄断领域中存在的问题与相关的改善措施,并且借鉴美、德、日等国家相关立法司法经验,来填补我国这方面的空白,以实现消费者权益保护的规范化和高效化。
[Abstract]:With the development of the market economy, on the basis of insisting on the first nature of market automatic regulation, the government not only regulates the market economy in the macro field, but also regulates the market subjects in the micro field. More and more attention is paid to the legal construction and supervision in the economic field. The subjects of various market legal relations are also aware of the importance of legislation involving their own related interests, and need relevant laws to regulate the behavior of some market subjects. To protect our legitimate rights and interests, the "Anti-monopoly Law" is to limit the harm caused by monopoly through legislation, to give full play to the advantages of market competition, and to prosper the economy. But in China, telecommunications, petrochemical, railway, and electric transport, Countries in areas such as tobacco are run exclusively by the state. In the field of public utilities, administrative agreements allow water, municipal, urban public transport, taxi and other industries to monopolize in some areas. We can see that these industries are closely related to each and every one of us, and there are bound to be disputes of all kinds. However, due to the particularity of these industries, it is difficult for the state to carry out spontaneous supervision in accordance with the anti-monopoly law. And the cost of bringing a lawsuit by citizens themselves is too high for the interests represented by the dispute itself. In this context, a social organization, that is, a consumer association, is needed to assume this social responsibility, thereby safeguarding the rights and interests of the broad masses of consumers. In order to contribute to the establishment of an orderly and healthy market economy, we should supervise the market behavior of one party providing products in the monopoly field. However, the monopoly industry not only needs a corresponding theoretical framework to institute consumer public interest litigation, There must also be a whole set of legal procedures to ensure its effectiveness, and at the same time it needs practical cases to prove its feasibility, so that consumer rights and interests can be protected in accordance with the law. In this paper, comparative analysis and empirical research methods are used. In the main part, through the economic and legal analysis of monopoly industry and anti-monopoly law, and explore the worldwide consumer public interest litigation status and related judicial system, as well as the relevant consumer public interest litigation cases are discussed. In order to put forward the problems and relevant improvement measures in the field of monopoly of consumer public interest litigation in China, and draw lessons from the relevant legislative and judicial experience of the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries, to fill the gap in this respect in our country. In order to realize the standardization and high efficiency of consumer rights and interests protection.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.8

【参考文献】