超越边界:业主的权利限制之比较分析

发布时间：2018-02-26 08:30

本文关键词： 业主权利专有财产共有财产权能限制比较法正当性　出处：《南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：基于对业主专有部分和共有部分的权利限制,现代都市里的业主所有权本身就蕴含了个体业主不能随心所欲地使用其物业这一概念。如何规约种种对业主所有权的限制是立法者和学术界所面临的问题。因此以确定边界为中心、以明确独占为导向的传统物权路径需要突破,对业主所有权的讨论要有权能交换的新思维和新分析框架,这为立法者和司法政策的价值规范判断提供了新元素——不必一概质疑,遵守私法自治,由合理的限制而产生令人舒畅的社区和友好的邻居可能对业主是更有利益的。在此,我们借鉴美国和南非的业主所有权(建筑物区分所有权)的法理演变和具体案例,并结合我国具体语境和实际情况,提出了解决方案建议。
[Abstract]:On the basis of limitations on the rights of the exclusive and common parts of the owner, The ownership of owners in modern cities contains the concept that individual owners cannot use their property as they wish. Therefore, how to regulate various restrictions on owners' ownership is a problem faced by legislators and academics. Focusing on the determination of borders, The traditional path of property right, which is guided by a clear monopoly, needs to break through, and the discussion of owner's ownership should have a new thinking and a new analytical framework of exchanging power, which provides a new element for the judgment of value norm of legislator and judicial policy-there is no need to question it all. Compliance with private law autonomy, resulting from reasonable restrictions leading to a comfortable community and friendly neighbours, may be of greater interest to the owner... in this case, We draw lessons from the legal evolution and concrete cases of owners' ownership (building ownership) in the United States and South Africa, and combine with the concrete context and actual situation of our country, and put forward the solution proposal.
【作者单位】：香港城市大学法学院;
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】