论工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合及其法律适用

发布时间：2018-03-02 22:22

本文选题：工伤保险赔偿　切入点：人身损害赔偿　出处：《广西师范大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着社会的飞速发展,工业化进程加速,工伤案件频频发生,给职工个人、用人单位带来了不利的影响。为了分散用人单位的风险,也为了让职工及时的获得医疗救济等,我国建立了社会保险制度。工伤事故同时满足了工伤保险赔偿及人身损害赔偿的构成要件,但由于我国法律的不完善,对此两种请求权的竞合应如何处理没有明确的规定,各地做法不一,严重影响了法律的权威性和严肃性,同时司法实践的不一致,也导致了司法的不公。本文将围绕工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合,从以下五个方面来研究：第一部分是关于工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合概述。论述了工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿的基本理论,工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权区分,及两者竞合的表现和特征,通过比较这两种请求权,区别两者的异同,充分了解这两种请求权；第二部分是关于我国工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合的法律法规规定。通过介绍我国对工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合的法律、行政法规及司法解释的相关规定,并总结了我国法律法规对两者竞合问题的规定存在的问题。通过法律、行政法规规章及司法解释对两者竞合的一些模糊的规定,分析了我国现存问题的立法弊端和司法弊端,进一步阐明亟待解决两者竞合问题的重要性及实际意义；第三部分是关于处理工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身侵权损害赔偿请求权竞合的司法实践。论述了在司法实践当中,当两种请求权发生竞合的时候,我国存在哪些不同的处理方式,以及在这些处理方式中所存在的问题；第四部分是关于国外有关工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合的处理模式与启示。论述了国外四种模式处理工伤保险赔偿请求权与侵权损害赔偿请求权竞合,即选择模式、替代模式、兼得模式、补充模式,分别介绍了这四种主流模式的优点和缺陷,并论述从国外的四种处理模式中获得的处理两种请求权竞合的启示；第五部分是关于处理工伤保险赔偿请求权与人身损害赔偿请求权竞合的完善建议。从制度、原则、立法等方面对我国处理两者竞合提出建议,认为不能用统一的方式方法处理两者竞合的问题,应该根据不同的情形适用不同的规定,从而既保护用人单位的合法权益,亦能保障劳动者的合法权益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of society and the acceleration of industrialization, the frequent occurrence of industrial injury cases has brought adverse effects to the employees and the employing units. In order to spread the risks of the employers and to enable the workers to obtain medical relief in a timely manner, Our country has established the social insurance system. The industrial injury accident has satisfied the constituent elements of the injury insurance compensation and the personal injury compensation at the same time. However, due to the imperfection of the law of our country, there is no clear stipulation on how to deal with the two kinds of claims. Different practices have seriously affected the authority and seriousness of the law, and at the same time, the inconsistency of judicial practice has also led to judicial injustice. This article will focus on the competition between the right to claim compensation for injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury. The first part is an overview of the competing rights of claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for personal injury, and discusses the basic theory of the right of claim for compensation for compensation of industrial injury insurance and compensation for personal injury. The distinction between the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of personal injury compensation, and the manifestation and characteristics of their concurrence, through comparing these two kinds of claim rights, distinguishing the similarities and differences between them, fully understand the two kinds of claim rights; The second part is about the laws and regulations about the concurrence of the right to claim for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal injury in our country. By introducing the law of the concurrence between the right of claim for compensation for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim compensation for personal injury in our country, The related provisions of administrative regulations and judicial interpretation, and summarizes the problems existing in the provisions of the laws and regulations of our country on the issue of the concurrence of the two. Through the laws, administrative regulations and rules and regulations and judicial interpretation of the competing of the two of the fuzzy provisions, This paper analyzes the legislative malpractice and judicial malpractice of the existing problems in our country, and further clarifies the importance and practical significance of the two problems urgently needed to be solved. The third part is about the judicial practice of dealing with the concurrence of the claim for compensation for compensation for industrial injury insurance and the claim for compensation for personal tort. And the problems existing in these methods; The 4th part is about the handling mode and inspiration of foreign countries about the concurrence of the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of personal injury compensation, and discusses the concurrence of four kinds of foreign modes dealing with the claim right of industrial injury insurance compensation and the claim right of tort damage compensation. This paper introduces the advantages and disadvantages of the four main modes, and discusses the enlightenment of the two competing claims from the four processing modes abroad. The 5th part is about the perfect suggestion to deal with the concurrence of the claim right of compensation for industrial injury insurance and the right to claim for personal injury. The author puts forward some suggestions on how to deal with the competing of the two in our country from the aspects of system, principle, legislation and so on. It is considered that the problem of competing between the two should not be dealt with in a unified way, and different regulations should be applied according to different circumstances, so as to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the employing unit and the legitimate rights and interests of the laborer.
【学位授予单位】：广西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】