超越避风港:网络交易平台专利侵权处理机制重构

发布时间：2018-03-03 20:40

本文选题：避风港规则　切入点：专利侵权　出处：《学术探索》2017年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：专利侵权纠纷的技术属性使得网络交易平台难以进行专利侵权判定,不宜要求平台就平台内存在的专利侵权行为履行"通知-移除"义务,建议构建分层的"通知-处理"系统,由权利人先寻求知识产权维权中心出具侵权判定,平台依据专利侵权判定结果及其他材料采取必要措施制止侵权。对于缺乏专利侵权判定意见书的通知,平台仅履行将通知转交给被投诉的平台内经营者的措施。在机制重塑的过程中,建议一方面将知识产权维权中心的法律地位类比为司法鉴定机构,并促使其进行市场化运营;另一方面,通过修改《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》第六十三条第二款,在立法上明确网络交易平台不再承担专利侵权判定责任。
[Abstract]:The technical attributes of patent infringement disputes make it difficult for the network trading platform to judge patent infringement, and it is not appropriate to require the platform to perform the obligation of "notifying and removing" the patent infringement existing in the platform. It is suggested that a hierarchical "Notification-processing" system should be constructed, in which the right holder should seek the IPR Center to issue a judgment on infringement. The platform shall take necessary measures to stop the infringement according to the judgment results and other materials of patent infringement. The platform only performs the measures of transferring the notice to the operators of the platform complained of. In the process of mechanism remodeling, it is suggested that, on the one hand, the legal status of the intellectual property rights center should be compared to that of the judicial authentication institution and promote its market-oriented operation; On the other hand, by amending the second paragraph of Article 63th of the revised draft of the Patent Law, it is clear in legislation that the network trading platform will no longer bear the judgment liability for patent infringement.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学广东国际战略研究院;华东政法大学知识产权学院;阿里巴巴集团;
【基金】：2016年广东省知识产权局软科学项目(GDIP2016-K8) 2014年广东省普通高校创新强校特色创新类项目
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】