论合同保护义务的应然范围
发布时间:2018-03-03 21:26
本文选题:保护义务 切入点:安全保障义务 出处:《清华法学》2015年06期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:合同保护义务是合同责任扩张的首要路径与受害人保护强化的必然结果。违反保护义务可产生合同解除权,其合同责任为过错责任,损害赔偿范围限定应抛弃可预见性规则。安全保障义务与保护义务本质相同,皆为法定义务,均造成固有利益损害,并导致侵权性损害赔偿责任。保护义务也可构成先合同义务,缔约过失责任是特殊的侵权责任。违反保护义务引发合同责任或侵权责任时,两种责任的实质差异有限。
[Abstract]:The obligation to protect the contract is the inevitable result of the expansion of the contract liability and the strengthening of the protection of the victim. The breach of the obligation of protection may give rise to the right of rescission of the contract, and its contractual liability is the fault liability. The scope of compensation for damages should be limited by the rule of predictability. The obligation of safety and security is essentially the same as the obligation of protection, which is both legal obligations and causes damage to the inherent interests. The obligation of protection may also constitute the obligation of prior contract, and the liability for fault in contracting is a special liability for tort. When the breach of obligation of protection leads to the liability of contract or tort, the essential difference between the two kinds of liability is limited.
【作者单位】: 山西财经大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社会科学基金项目(14BFX118) 山西省软科学研究计划项目(2014041017—5)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:D923.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈现杰;《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的若干理论与实务问题解析[J];法律适用;2004年02期
2 叶i吰,
本文编号:1562754
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1562754.html