论人格权独立成编的技术障碍

发布时间：2018-03-04 15:33

本文选题：人格利益　切入点：人格权　出处：《政法论丛》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：如果人格权在民法典分则中独立成编,则意味着与物权、债权和身份权并列规定的人格权具有民事权利的性质,由此,人格权的独立成编必须克服两个立法技术上的障碍:一是人格权的民法保护难以覆盖人们在民事领域之外的社会生活领域中依法享有的人格权利;二是在侵权责任法独立成编的体制之下,人格权编将因为人格权的法定性、防御性而严重缺乏行为规范(裁判规范)的具体内容。中国法学会民法研究会提出的《人格权法编专家建议稿(征求意见稿)》未能克服前述障碍,其"一般条款"未能将人格权的民法保护扩张于民事领域之外,其具有的106个条文(不包括"附则")中,有86个条文属于"不合格"条文而应予剔除。由此表明,人格权之独立成编不具有立法上的科学性和可行性。
[Abstract]:If the personality right is made up independently in the civil code, it means that the personality right, which is juxtaposed with the real right, the creditor's right and the status right, has the nature of civil rights. The independent compilation of personality rights must overcome two technical obstacles in legislation: one is that the civil law protection of personality rights can hardly cover the personality rights that people enjoy in the field of social life outside the civil field according to law; Second, under the system of independent compilation of tort liability laws, personality rights will be codified because of the legal nature of personality rights. Defensiveness and serious lack of concrete content of the code of conduct (adjudicative norm). The expert's proposal (draft for comments) on the compilation of personal Rights Law proposed by the Civil Law Research Association of the Chinese Society of Law has failed to overcome the aforementioned obstacles. Its General provisions fail to extend the civil protection of personality rights beyond the civil sphere, and 86 of its 106 articles (excluding the Supplementary provisions) are "unqualified" and should be removed. The independence of personality right is not scientific and feasible in legislation.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】