当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

四份涉及历史虚无主义民事判决书的判决共识及其历史意义

发布时间:2018-03-05 14:23

  本文选题:历史虚无主义 切入点:狼牙山五壮士 出处:《世界社会主义研究》2016年01期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:2015年年底至2016年年中,北京市两级人民法院先后就涉及历史虚无主义的四起民事侵权案件作出了四份民事判决书,这四份民事判决书形成的共识是:中国共产党是抗日战争的中流砥柱;决不能诋毁"狼牙山五壮士"英雄事迹和英雄本人;质疑或颠覆"狼牙山五壮士"英雄形象的行为不仅是对英雄的亵渎,同时是对广大人民群众感情的严重伤害;对质疑或颠覆"狼牙山五壮士"英雄形象的行为持否定态度;对维护"狼牙山五壮士"英雄形象的行为持事实上的肯定态度。四份民事判决书在个案诉讼中对历史虚无主义的反对,是国家机关以宪法为根本的活动准则、维护宪法尊严和保证宪法实施的具体体现,它的意义不仅在于对民事侵权案件的裁判,更在于对中国特色社会主义宪法秩序的维护和彰显。其所形成的判决共识对于以后的涉及历史虚无主义的民事案件的审理活动具有重大的司法意义,同时对于理论界对历史虚无主义的反对也起到了鼓舞人心的作用。可通过案例指导制度,使四份民事判决书能够对以后的涉及历史虚无主义的民事侵权案件的审理活动具有法理乃至法律上的约束力。
[Abstract]:From the end of 2015 to the middle of 2016, the Beijing Municipal people's Court at two levels handed down four civil judgments on four civil infringement cases involving historical nihilism. The consensus of the four civil judgments is that the Communist Party of China is the mainstay of the War of Resistance against Japan, that the heroic deeds and the hero himself of the "Langya Mountain five strong Men" must not be denigrated; The act of questioning or subverting the heroic image of the "Langya Mountain five strong Men" is not only a blasphemy to the hero, but also a serious injury to the feelings of the masses of the people, and a negative attitude towards questioning or subverting the heroic image of the "five strong men in Langya Mountain". To uphold the heroic image of the "Langya Mountain five strong Men" has a de facto positive attitude. The opposition to historical nihilism in the four civil judgments in the case proceedings is the fundamental activity criterion of state organs based on the Constitution. The significance of safeguarding the dignity of the Constitution and ensuring the implementation of the Constitution lies not only in the adjudication of civil tort cases, More importantly, it is the maintenance and manifestation of the constitutional order of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The judgment consensus it forms has great judicial significance for the trial of civil cases involving historical nihilism in the future. At the same time, it has also played an encouraging role in the theoretical circle's opposition to historical nihilism. So that the four civil judgments can have legal and even legal binding force on the judicial activities of civil tort cases involving historical nihilism.
【作者单位】: 兰州大学法学院;
【分类号】:D925.1;D923

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 裴秀峰;;民事判决书“案由”应准确规范[J];山东法学;1986年02期

2 曹建厚;“归”和“属”的概念和使用[J];法学;1985年03期

3 杨硕帆;;从一份民事判决书看瑶族农村事实婚姻问题[J];法制与社会;2012年13期

4 刘海旗;赵静;张广良;江建中;;北大方正集团公司、北京红楼计算机科学技术研究所诉北京高术天力科技有限公司、北京高术科技公司侵犯计算机软件著作权案一审判决书 北京市第一中级人民法院民事判决书[J];网络法律评论;2003年00期

5 ;[J];;年期



本文编号:1570609

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1570609.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户a1a2e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com