不动产登记机关的审查义务研究

发布时间：2018-03-06 00:31

本文选题：不动产登记机关　切入点：审查义务　出处：《内蒙古大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：我国不动产登记机关的审查义务问题在理论上一直存有争议,争议主要集中在审查义务的定性上,即我国是采用形式审查还是实质审查,司法实践中各地法院对不动产登记机关的登记行为进行司法审查时宽严不一。由于现行法律对不动产登记的审查义务的性质缺乏明确规定,才会出现上述问题,鉴于此,笔者结合《物权法》及相关规定和司法实践的做法,对我国不动产登记机关的审查义务定性及实施问题进行探讨和研究。论文分为四个部分。第一部分通过分析不动产登记机关审查义务的概念及现状,参考《物权法》、《不动产登记暂行条例》等相关法律法规的规定,找出其不足,并对实务的影响进行了分析。第二部分从比较法的视角上分析了日本、法国、瑞士、德国以及我国台湾地区不动产登记机关的审查义务,并对我国不动产登记机关的审查义务可以借鉴的部分进行了思考。第三部分通过解读《物权法》第12条,阐述了《物权法》摒弃了单一的审查方式,转而采取了形式审查为主,实质审查为辅的模式,并从交易效率与交易安全的视角,论证其合理性。第四部分结合案例,从对权利主体、权利客体和权利内容如何审查的角度分析了登记机关审查义务的具体实施问题。
[Abstract]:There has always been a dispute about the examination obligation of the real estate registration authority in our country, which is mainly focused on the qualitative nature of the review obligation, that is, whether our country adopts formal review or substantive review. In judicial practice, the judicial review of the registration of immovable property by the courts varies widely and strictly. Because the nature of the obligation to review the registration of immovable property is not clearly defined in the current law, the above problems will arise. In view of this, The author combines the practice of "Real right Law" and related regulations and judicial practice, This paper is divided into four parts. The first part analyzes the concept and present situation of the examination obligation of the real estate registration authority. Referring to the relevant laws and regulations, such as the Real right Law, the Provisional regulations on Registration of Real Estate, and other relevant laws and regulations, to find out its shortcomings, and to analyze the impact of practice. The second part analyzes Japan, France and Switzerland from the perspective of comparative law. The review obligation of the real estate registration authorities in Germany and Taiwan, and the part that can be used for reference by the real estate registration authorities in our country. The third part, through the interpretation of Article 12 of the Real right Law, This paper expounds that the Real right Law has abandoned the single way of examination, and has adopted the mode of form review as the main part and the substance examination as the auxiliary mode, and demonstrates its rationality from the perspective of transaction efficiency and transaction security. Part 4th combines with a case study. From the angle of how to examine the subject, object and content of the right, this paper analyzes the implementation of the examination obligation of the registration authority.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】