论动产抵押权的登记对抗

发布时间：2018-03-06 22:04

本文选题：动产抵押权　切入点：登记对抗主义　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文基于中国当前的法律规定,从动产抵押权登记对抗的基本原理和构造出发,探讨了动产抵押权和其他类型权利发生对抗时的权利优先顺位问题,并以此来确定动产抵押权登记对抗在我国法律实践中的真实样貌,并从应然角度进一步明确其理论内涵和外延。文章分为四章。第一章简要概述动产抵押权登记对抗的立法例。进入现代后,动产抵押权采用登记对抗主义的立法例较为常见。笔者简要介绍了法国、日本、美国、中国台湾地区和中国大陆关于登记对抗主义的立法现状。第二章分析动产抵押权登记对抗的基本理论。第一节介绍并分析日本法上登记对抗的多种理论构造,并提出"第三人主张说"是较为适合中国动产抵押权登记对抗的理论构造。第二节介绍了我国理论界对"对抗"一词含义的理解,并认为动产抵押权和其他权利之间对抗的本质是权利的优先实现顺位的问题。第三节分析动产抵押登记的对抗力与公信力,并认为动产抵押权登记仅具有对抗力。最后提出动产抵押权登记的对抗力和"第三人主张说"是从法律关系的内部和外部两方面,内外呼应以实现对动产抵押权登记对抗的统一解释。第四节分析了未登记的动产抵押权的性质。第三章宏观分析第三人的范围。第一节通过分析日本和我国关于第三人范围的理论,提出动产抵押权未登记不得对抗的第三人是指处于与抵押人的有效交易关系中,需要根据动产抵押权登记与否确定权利优先实现顺位的人。第二节通过分析日本法上关于第三人主观心态的学说发展历程,并结合我国的现状和立法目的,认为我国应坚持我国当前法律对第三人"善意"的要求。第三节从抵押权登记与否的社会成本角度提出,当前中国应对第三人的范围做扩张解释,以限制未登记的动产抵押权的效力,反向刺激登记,进一步促进动产抵押权登记制度的完善。第四章详细分析动产抵押权和其他类型权利发生对抗的多种具体情形。第一节分析认为完全无权利人等与动产抵押权人在法律上不发生权利对抗。第二节分析动产抵押权与一般债权,认为与动产抵押权人产生对抗的主要是破产债权人、扣押债权人、查封债权人等,并应当适用登记对抗。第三节分析动产抵押权与租赁权,认为动产不应当适用"买卖不破租赁",而应适用动产抵押权的登记对抗。第四节分析抵押物转让中的动产抵押权。在抵押物转让的区分说下,登记对抗只有在抵押权人不同意的情形才有些许发挥作用的空间。第五节分析动产抵押权与他物权。动产抵押权之间的对抗应当适用物权法第199条的特殊规定。动产抵押权和质权之间,不应忽视质权占有的公示作用。动产抵押权和留置权之间,对商事留置权应当适用登记对抗;一般留置权应当以立法政策为导向,恒优于动产抵押权。笔者从法律实然的角度出发,从具体的权利对抗中直观地观察动产抵押权登记对抗的内涵及外延。由于我国目前立法中的一些特殊利益考量、特殊权利性质、以及立法规定的疏漏或过于概括等原因,登记对抗在动产抵押具体的权利对抗中并未得到充分适用。笔者的分析最终落脚于应然角度,认为动产抵押权的登记对抗应当在动产抵押权与其他权利发生对抗的大多数情形中得到适用。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the current legal provisions China based on the basic principle and the structure of chattels mortgage registration counter based on the chattel mortgage right and other rights type confrontation the rights of priority issues, and to determine the true appearance of chattel mortgage registration confrontation in our legal practice, and further clear the theoretical connotation and extension from the theoretical point of view. The article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter summarizes the chattel mortgage registration against the legislation. In the modern, chattel mortgage legislation by registration antagonism is more common. The author briefly describes the United States, France, Japan, on the legislative status of registration antagonism in Taiwan, Chinese and Chinese. The second chapter analysis the basic theory of real estate mortgage registration confrontation. The first section introduces and analyzes several theoretical structure of Japanese law registration confrontation, and put forward the "No. Three people say that "is more suitable for theoretical construction of chattel mortgage registration against the real China. The second section introduces the theory circle of our country" confrontation "to understand the meaning, and that the essence of confrontation between chattel mortgage and other rights are the rights of priority ranking problems. The third section analysis the resistance and the credibility of chattel mortgage registration, and that the chattel mortgage registration is only against the force. Finally put forward the chattel mortgage registration counter force and claim that" third "is from the two aspects of the legal relationship of internal and external, internal and external echo in order to achieve the real estate mortgage registration against the uniform interpretation. The fourth section analyzes the unregistered nature of real estate mortgage. Third Zhang Hongguan analysis of the scope of third people. The first section through theoretical analysis on the scope of the third Japan and China, the chattel mortgage registration shall not fight third Refers to the effective trading relationship is in and the mortgagor, according to the needs of the real estate mortgage registration or not determine the priority of rights realization of cis position. The second section through the analysis of Japanese law about Third People's subjective attitude theory development process, combined with the present situation of our country and the purpose of legislation, China should insist that I think our current law on the third "good faith" requirements. The third section from the mortgage registration and the social cost perspective whether the proposed scope of the current Chinese deal with third people do interpreted to limit the unregistered effect of chattel mortgage right, reverse stimulation and further improve the registration of chattel mortgage registration system. The fourth chapter detailed analysis of chattel mortgage and other types of rights against the specific circumstances vary. The first section analysis that no obligee and chattel mortgage rights in the law does not occur right against the second section. Analysis of chattel mortgage and general creditor's rights, and that mortgagee confrontation is mainly creditors, creditors and other creditors seized, seized, and shall be registered against. The third section analyzes the chattel mortgage and lease, that real estate should not apply to the lease sale, and shall apply chattel mortgage registration confrontation. The fourth section analysis in the transfer of mortgaged chattel mortgage. Distinction in the mortgaged property transfer said, only in the mortgage registration against the people do not agree with the situation that some space for the role. The fifth section analyzes the chattel mortgage and usufruct between chattel mortgage. Right against property law shall apply 199th special provisions. Between chattel mortgage and pledge, share pledge publicity effects should not be ignored. The chattel mortgage and lien, shall apply to the registration of commercial lien against a lien; Right to legislative policy oriented, constant is better than that of chattel mortgage. The author from the perspective of legal practice, the specific rights against the direct observation of dynamic connotation and extension of chattel mortgage registration counter. Because our country at present some special interest in the legislation of special considerations, rights of nature, and legislation too general omission or other reasons, the registration confrontation in chattel mortgage has not been specific rights against the full application. The author analysis eventually settled in the ideal perspective, think of chattel mortgage right shall be registered against most cases occurred in the confrontation of chattel mortgage rights and he applied.

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】