中美国际贸易中专利维权的制度差异:基于案例的比较研究

发布时间：2018-03-09 15:56

本文选题：专利保护　切入点：国际贸易　出处：《中国软科学》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文以通领科技集团有限公司与美国断路器企业的知识产权纠纷为案例,分析中美两国在国际贸易中的专利保护制度差异。研究发现美国在进口环节设置的337调查作为一种准司法制度,有效弥补了专利司法保护国际贸易领域的缺点,其实质是保护美国国内产业,具有"防火墙"的功能。比较而言,中国针对专利侵权的行政保护力度弱,未能真正发挥对司法制度的补充作用,同时本土企业在国际贸易中缺少有针对性并行之有效的专利维权渠道。本文认为,在整体上提高我国专利行政保护力度的前提下,有必要针对国内和国际贸易这两个不同领域的特点,构建有差异的专利行政保护体系。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the intellectual property dispute between Tongling Technology Group Co., Ltd. and American Circuit Breaker Enterprise as an example. This paper analyzes the differences of patent protection systems between China and the United States in international trade. It is found that as a quasi-judicial system, the 337 investigation set up by the United States in import links has effectively made up for the shortcomings in the field of patent judicial protection in the field of international trade. Its essence is to protect the domestic industry of the United States and has the function of "firewall". In comparison, China's administrative protection against patent infringement is weak, and it has not really played a supplementary role to the judicial system. At the same time, the local enterprises lack the targeted and effective patent protection channels in international trade. This paper holds that, on the premise of improving the administrative protection of patent in our country as a whole, It is necessary to construct different patent administrative protection system according to the characteristics of domestic and international trade.
【作者单位】：清华大学科学技术与社会研究所;
【基金】：清华大学自主科研项目“中国重大科技创新的社会研究:案例分析与理论探索”(20141081191)
【分类号】：D923.4;D971.2;DD913

【相似文献】