专利侵权判定中等同原则的适用

发布时间：2018-03-09 18:20

本文选题：等同原则　切入点：联想容易性　出处：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：全面覆盖原则作为专利侵权判定的基本规则,需得被指控侵权行为完全落入权利要求书之范围,方可构成侵权。此举可能因行为人刻意制造的所谓"差异"而逾越权利要求书的界限,因囿于权利要求的字面含义而规避侵权责任。为此,美国法院在长期实践中,归结出等同原则,在一定程度上弥补全面覆盖原则的不足。因此,建立因行为人以方式、功能和效果的相同或基本相同的行为模式成就技术效果实际等同而构成侵权的规则,让权利人的利益获得实质保障。我国司法实践中,对等同原则的适用,采取"功能-方式-效果"的"三一致"标准。该标准虽然适时的解决了大部分机械、电学领域的等同问题,但在化学领域的应用当中存在例外情况,特别是随着科技的精细化和发明的复杂化,三一致标准的不足逐步突显。本文从等同原则基本理论出发,将等同原则置于专利侵权判定规则的前提下,指出与全面覆盖原则相对应的这一原则对实质保护权利人利益的积极效果和意义;以案例和数据为基础,分析归结出实践中存在的适用困境;又基于等同原则构成要素和条件的分析,指出这些要素和条件对于等同原则适用的一般性要求;鉴于我国"三一致标准"的现实难题,提出完善非实质性差异标准和歼降低联想容易性程度的思考。
[Abstract]:The principle of full coverage, as the basic rule for the adjudication of patent infringement, requires that the alleged infringement fall entirely within the scope of the claim, This act may exceed the limits of the claim because of the so-called "difference" deliberately created by the perpetrator, and circumvent the liability for infringement because of the literal meaning of the claim. For this reason, the United States courts have been in practice for a long time. Summing up the principle of equivalence, to a certain extent to make up for the deficiency of the principle of total coverage. In the judicial practice of our country, the application of the principle of equivalence adopts the "Trinity" standard of "function-method-effect". This standard has solved most of the machinery in good time. The problem of equivalence in the field of electricity, but there are exceptions in the application of chemistry, especially with the refinement of science and technology and the complication of invention, the deficiency of the standard of trinity is gradually highlighted. Under the premise of patent infringement determination rule, this paper points out the positive effect and significance of the principle corresponding to the principle of total coverage on the substantive protection of the interests of the obligee, which is based on cases and data. Based on the analysis of the constituent elements and conditions of the principle of equivalence, the author points out the general requirements for the application of these elements and conditions to the principle of equivalence. Put forward to improve the standard of non-substantive difference and reduce the associative ease of thinking.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】