委托合同任意解除的损害赔偿

发布时间：2018-03-09 20:19

本文选题：委托合同　切入点：任意解除　出处：《法学研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：委托合同任意解除的损害赔偿问题,学界和实务界多围绕履行利益、信赖利益、直接损失等概念展开分析,争议不断。委托合同任意解除权的制度目的,因委托的有偿与否、任意解除权发动主体的不同而不同,在损害赔偿范围的考量上亦应注意到此等差异。委托人任意解除时,受托人就事务处理存有自身利益的,无论有偿与否,此等利益的损失应纳入合同法第410条意义上的损失的范围。委托人任意解除有偿委托的,可归入因可归责于债权人事由的履行不能,受托人可依风险负担规则请求将来报酬并作相应扣减,此等报酬并非合同法第410条意义上的损失。受托人任意解除无偿委托,可参照赠与人任意撤销赠与时的处理,赔偿委托人受损的信赖利益。受托人任意解除有偿委托的,受托人并不承担拒绝履行的违约责任,应区分是否得以采取替代措施,分别承担因解除而增加的费用的赔偿或者是因解除而无法继续该事务处理所引起的损害赔偿责任。在需要作出特别政策考量的消费者合同、类似劳动关系的委托合同等领域,则结合相关政策要求对损害赔偿的范围作出限定或扩张。
[Abstract]:Concerning the problem of compensation for damages caused by arbitrary rescission of a commission contract, the academic and practical circles often analyze the concepts of performance interest, trust interest, direct loss, etc. There are many disputes. The institutional purpose of the right of arbitrary rescission of the entrustment contract is due to whether or not the entrustment is paid or not. Different and different subjects of arbitrary rescission power should also pay attention to these differences in the consideration of the scope of compensation for damages. If the trustee has his own interests in the handling of the affairs when the principal is discharged arbitrarily, whether he is paid or not, The loss of these interests shall be included in the scope of the loss within the meaning of Article 410 of the contract Law. The trustee may, in accordance with the risk burden rule, request future remuneration and make a corresponding deduction, which is not a loss within the meaning of Article 410 of the contract Law. Where the trustee arbitrarily rescinds the reimbursable trust, the trustee shall not bear the responsibility for breach of contract which he refuses to perform, and shall distinguish whether or not he can take alternative measures. In areas such as consumer contracts requiring special policy consideration, contracts such as entrustment contracts for labor relations, which are respectively liable for compensation for additional expenses incurred as a result of the cancellation or for damages arising from the inability to continue with the handling of the matter as a result of the cancellation. Then combined with the relevant policy requirements to limit or expand the scope of damages.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目“民法典编纂中的服务合同立法研究”(15AFX016) 国家“万人计划”青年拔尖人才项目的成果
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】