大数据时代用户数据利益保护中的权利平衡

发布时间：2018-03-11 02:37

本文选题：大数据　切入点：用户数据　出处：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：大数据时代的到来,改变了用户数据的运用方式,而大量用户数据的规模化运用也为相关主体的利益保护带来了新的法律问题。如何对这些用户数据流转过程中所产生的用户主体利益失衡问题进行法律上的平衡,将是立法机构必须予以解决的棘手问题。本文对相关主体在不同数据利用阶段中的数据利益失衡问题进行了深入的分析,并以我国法制现状为基础,对大数据时代下用户数据利益失衡问题提出了相关的立法建议,试图为数字经济的发展作出一点贡献。本文分为以下三个部分:第一部分介绍了大数据时代对用户数据利益保护带来的挑战。认为大数据时代下,用户数据范围更加广阔,价值有所提升,电子化数据的数量也在不断增长,结构和隐私风险也都发生了变化,从而导致用户与数据收集者、处理者和使用者之间的利益产生了失衡。第二部分深入分析了用户与相关主体利益失衡的原因。认为我国对用户数据进行保护的模式,类似于以欧盟为代表的本体主义模式,但又不如欧盟保护那么严格,其不同于以美国为代表的实用主义模式。随后,文章提出我国现行法律对大数据时代下用户数据保护规定存在不足,现有的告知同意机制和目的限制原则已经出现了局限性,而且我国法律目前并没有明确承认用户对其数据享有财产权。这些都对用户数据价值的挖掘和社会经济的发展产生了阻碍。第三部分则是对大数据时代用户数据利益失衡问题的制度完善提出建议。认为我国立法机构在进行立法时,对现有的立法模式进行改进,不仅要加强对用户数据流转过程中的权利保护,而且要促进用户数据的流通与利用。在具体制度设计上,对现有法律规定的通知制度进行完善,将消极同意作为同意的主要方式,促进个人数据的二次利用,引入“查询权”和“反对权”,确立个人数据财产权。
[Abstract]:The arrival of big data's era has changed the way user data is used. The large-scale application of a large number of user data also brings new legal problems for the protection of the interests of the relevant subjects. This paper makes a deep analysis of the imbalance of data interests in different stages of data utilization, and based on the current situation of our country's legal system, it will be the thorny problem that must be solved by the legislature. This paper puts forward relevant legislative suggestions on the imbalance of user data interests in big data's time. This paper is divided into the following three parts: the first part introduces the challenges brought by big data's era to the protection of user's data interests. The value has increased, the amount of electronic data has been growing, and the structure and privacy risks have changed, leading to users and data collectors. The second part deeply analyzes the reasons for the imbalance between the interests of users and related subjects. The author thinks that the mode of protecting user data in our country is similar to the ontological model represented by the European Union. However, it is not as strict as the EU's protection, which is different from the pragmatic model represented by the United States. Subsequently, the article points out that the existing laws of our country have shortcomings in the protection of user data under big data's time. Existing communication consent mechanisms and the principle of limitation of purpose have been limited, Moreover, at present, the law of our country has not explicitly recognized that the user has the property right to his data. All of these have hindered the mining of user data value and the development of social economy. The third part is to the user data of big data era. This paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of the imbalance of interests. It is believed that when the legislature of our country carries out legislation, To improve the existing legislative model, we should not only strengthen the protection of rights in the process of user data circulation, but also promote the circulation and utilization of user data. Taking negative consent as the main way of consent, promoting the secondary use of personal data, introducing "query right" and "objection right", and establishing personal data property right.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】