共同饮酒法律责任实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-14 03:31

  本文选题：共同饮酒　切入点：侵权　出处：《北方法学》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过对我国涉及共同饮酒的142个侵权案件的判决理由进行类型化分析发现,根据法院判决对注意义务的认定,可以区分为"危险防范义务"、"安全保障义务"、"法定附随义务"、"一般注意义务"等。通过在法理上对这些注意义务的来源进行辨析,其均存在一定问题。在与此相关的侵权案件审理中,法官通过扩大注意义务范围对社会交往规则进行调整,以司法政策为导向的过错认定有一定弊端,应当在侵权案件审理中坚持司法克制。
[Abstract]:Through the classification analysis of the adjudication reasons of 142 tort cases involving joint drinking in our country, it is found that according to the judgment of the court to the duty of care, It can be divided into "hazard prevention obligations", "safety and security obligations", "statutory collateral obligations", "general duty of care" and so on. In the trial of related tort cases, judges adjust the rules of social communication by expanding the scope of duty of care, and the judicial policy-oriented fault determination has some drawbacks. Judicial restraint should be upheld in the trial of infringement cases.
【作者单位】： 国家法官学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目“审判视野下侵权责任构成要件的证成规则”(13SFB4009) 北京市社科基金一般项目“恶意诉讼行为的侵权法规制”(13FXB016)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：1609409