重复诉讼禁止及其在知识产权民事纠纷中的应用——基本概念解析、重塑与案例群形成

发布时间：2018-03-16 20:51

本文选题：诉讼标的　切入点：诉讼请求　出处：《法学研究》2017年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》第247条是中国法中首次对重复诉讼禁止作出明文规定的一个尝试。由于该条所使用的关键术语——诉讼标的与诉讼请求——的含义不够确定,所以易于导致法律适用的不统一。解决这一问题的途径在于首先明确这两个概念的含义。针对诉讼标的,可以延续中国民事诉讼法所一贯遵循的旧实体法说,但应明确案件事实在识别诉讼标的过程中所发挥的作用。针对诉讼请求,则有必要确立一个不因诉讼标的理论的不同而变化的、恒定的诉讼请求概念。在此基础上,把民事诉讼法关于重复诉讼禁止的一般理论运用到知识产权民事纠纷之中,可以根据司法实践总结出若干案例群,并对法院的处理方式提出相应的解决方案。
[Abstract]:Article 247 of the interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on the Application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China is the first attempt in Chinese law to expressly stipulate the prohibition of repeated proceedings. -the meaning of the subject matter of the action and the claim is not certain, Therefore, it is easy to lead to the inconsistent application of the law. The way to solve this problem lies in first clarifying the meaning of the two concepts. With regard to the object of the lawsuit, we can continue the old substantive law that has always been followed by the Chinese Civil procedure Law. However, it is necessary to make clear the role of the facts of the case in the process of identifying the subject matter of the lawsuit. In view of the litigation claim, it is necessary to establish a constant concept of the claim which does not change according to the theory of the subject matter of the lawsuit. Applying the general theory of repeated litigation prohibition in the civil procedure law to the civil disputes of intellectual property rights, we can sum up some case groups according to the judicial practice, and put forward the corresponding solutions to the ways of the courts.
【作者单位】：德国弗莱堡大学法律系;
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1

【相似文献】