试论我国证券侵权救济的群体诉讼模式选择

发布时间：2018-03-18 17:10

本文选题：证券侵权　切入点：群体诉讼　出处：《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：各国证券侵权救济的诉讼制度存在很大差异,我国证券侵权群体诉讼模式的选择与构建,要高度重视本土资源的挖掘和利用。我国立法规定的人数不确定代表人诉讼制度在设计理念方面符合现代群体纠纷的解决理念和要求,该制度未能在证券侵权诉讼中得到适用,是由于司法政策的限制,而非其在技术层面存在不可克服的障碍。我国的人数不确定代表人诉讼与共同诉讼存在根本差别,与美国集团诉讼在价值追求上具有相似性,兼顾了各方利益需求,是我国证券侵权群体诉讼的合理模式,但在具体规则上还需要加以完善。
[Abstract]:There are great differences in the litigation system of securities tort relief in various countries, and the choice and construction of litigation mode of securities tort group in China. We should attach great importance to the excavation and utilization of local resources. The number of uncertain representative litigation system stipulated in our country's legislation conforms to the modern concept and requirements of solving group disputes in terms of design concept, and this system has not been applied in the securities tort litigation. Because of the limitation of judicial policy, not the insurmountable obstacle in the technical level, there is a fundamental difference between representative litigation and joint action in our country, which is similar to the value pursuit of American class action. Taking into account the interests of all parties, it is a reasonable mode of securities tort group litigation in China, but the specific rules still need to be improved.
【作者单位】：南京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏省法学会重点课题《依法处置群体性事件体制机制研究——以证券诉讼为视角》(批准号:SFH2013A04)
【分类号】：D925.1;D923

【共引文献】