零部件销售导致组合物专利权利用尽研究——以美国、德国判例为视角

发布时间：2018-03-22 19:56

本文选题：零部件　切入点：组合物专利　出处：《知识产权》2017年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在规制零部件销售与组合物专利权利用尽的问题上,美、德两国所持的立场和原则是相同的,即防止专利权人就相同的专利发明重复获得许可费。因此,美、德两国都承认零部件销售可以导致组合物专利的权利用尽,但需要满足一定的前提:该零部件必须体现了组合物专利的"实质特征"且不具有任何"非侵权用途"。"实质特征"是指系争权利要求与现有技术相比时具有可专利意义的显著技术特征;零部件具有"非侵权用途"是指其可以被"合理地"以非侵权方式加以使用。在零部件没体现组合物实质特征时,美国从默示许可理论出发,根据个案和销售不具有"非侵权用途"零部件的事实,推论出使用组合物专利的默示许可,德国判例虽未明确阐释但也与之暗合。上述裁判思路值得我国法院借鉴。
[Abstract]:The United States and Germany hold the same position and principle on regulating the sale of parts and the use of the patent right of composition, that is, to prevent the patentee from repeatedly obtaining a licence fee for the same patented invention. Both Germany and Germany acknowledge that the sale of components can lead to the exhaustion of patent rights for compositions, However, certain premises must be met: the component must embody the "substantive characteristics" of the composition patent and do not have any "non-infringing use". "substantive feature" means that the claim is specific when compared with existing technology. Significant technical characteristics of beneficial meaning; The "non-tort use" of a component means that it can be used "reasonably" in a non-infringing manner. When the component does not embody the substantive characteristics of the composition, the United States proceeds from the implied licensing theory. According to the fact that the case and the sale of non-infringing parts and components are not used for "non-infringing purposes", it is inferred that the implied license to use the composition patent is not clearly explained in the German case, but it is also consistent with it.
【作者单位】：同济大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科一般项目(15BFX170)“网络环境下专利权的扩张及应对研究” 教育部人文社科项目(14YJC820077) 上海市哲学社会科学规划一般课题(2014BFX002)“中美信息技术产业专利危机及专利制度优化比较研究”的资助
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】