互联网环境下著作权精神权利重构

发布时间：2018-03-24 05:35

本文选题：精神权利　切入点：互联网　出处：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：网络环境下版权精神权利保护是国际知识产权界研究的一个重要的理论课题。由于两大法系传统版权立法哲学基础的差异,至今未找到公认的正确解决途径。网络环境下,数字化技术使得任何作品都可被复制成一组以“0”、“1”表现的数字代码形式,作品的改动变得极为容易,版权人的作者身份权和保护作品完整权等精神权利面临严峻的挑战。如果真像有些学者所说的那样,在网络空间消灭版权精神权利保护,那将会导致一损俱损的后果。可以说,能否恰当处理精神权利问题直接关系到未来的信息产业、知识经济整体发展的成败。本文主体内容可分为四部分:第一部分是对著作权精神权利的概述,对发表权、署名权、修改权、保护作品完整权进行了系统概述,并着重介绍了几大精神权利在互联网环境下受侵害的现状。另外还完整概述了我国精神权利相关规定,主要是关于精神权利保护现状和目前体系下不合理之处。目前我国对精神权利规定不合理之处主要是内容体系设计不合理、权能内容限制存在缺失等方面。第二部分主要讨论了互联网环境下精神权利是否有存在的必要,笔者主要介绍了互联网对精神权利的挑战,涉及精神权利弱化、与电子商务的发展相矛盾、与言论自由和创作自由相矛盾等方面。笔者还从网络环境下精神权利存在的价值出发讨论精神权利在互联网环境下存在的意义。在网络环境下精神权利关乎利益平衡,关乎经济权利的实现,对鼓励创作促进文化繁荣意义巨大,因而笔者得出互联网环境下不可废除精神权利这一论断。第三部分主要介绍了两大法系的几个典型国家对精神权利的保护现状以及上述国家应对网络环境挑战对精神权利做的变通规定。大陆法系国家主要是法国、德国、日本,笔者重点介绍了日本的合理使用制度及其1994年关于修改精神权利以适应网络发展的两个方案。英美法系国家主要介绍了英国和美国,侧重介绍了英美由不承认精神权利到保护精神权利并对精神权利进行合理使用限制这一过程。另外笔者还简要提及了几大国际公约,如《伯尔尼公约》、《世界版权公约》等关于精神权利的相关规定。第四部分亦即本文核心所在,笔者借鉴两大法系主要国家经验探讨了我国该怎样重构精神权利以适应互联网的发展。笔者主要围绕重构精神权利内涵,将修改权和保护作品完整权合二为一并重新界定保护作品完整权的内涵,重构精神权利权能限制,引入合理使用制度,有条件地允许精神权利的转让和许可使用,完善著作集体权管理组织,把精神权利的保护纳入其权利范围之内。笔者在此部分用大量笔墨论述了如何重构及如何对典型国家的规定进行借鉴取舍。
[Abstract]:The protection of intellectual property rights under the network environment is an important theoretical subject in the international intellectual property field. Due to the differences in the philosophical basis of the traditional copyright legislation between the two legal systems, no recognized correct solution has been found. Digital technology allows any work to be copied into a set of digital codes in the form of "0", "1", and changes to the work become extremely easy. The author's right to identity and the right to protect the integrity of the work are facing severe challenges. If, as some scholars have said, the elimination of the protection of the copyright's spiritual rights in cyberspace will result in a total loss. Whether the spiritual rights can be properly dealt with is directly related to the future information industry and the success or failure of the overall development of knowledge economy. The main content of this paper can be divided into four parts: the first part is an overview of the spiritual rights of copyright, the right to publish and the right to be signed. The right to modify, the right to protect the integrity of the work is systematically summarized, and the current situation of several spiritual rights being violated under the Internet environment is emphatically introduced. In addition, the relevant provisions on spiritual rights in China are also summarized. It is mainly about the current situation of the protection of spiritual rights and the unreasonableness under the present system. At present, the unreasonable provisions on spiritual rights in our country are mainly the unreasonable design of the content system. The second part mainly discusses the necessity of the existence of the spiritual right in the Internet environment. The author mainly introduces the challenge of the Internet to the spiritual right, which involves the weakening of the spiritual right. Contradictory to the development of electronic commerce, In contradiction with freedom of speech and freedom of creation, the author also discusses the significance of the existence of spiritual rights in the Internet environment from the perspective of the value of the existence of spiritual rights in the network environment, in which spiritual rights are related to the balance of interests. It is about the realization of economic rights, and it is of great significance to encourage creation and promote cultural prosperity. The third part mainly introduces the current situation of the protection of spiritual rights in several typical countries of the two legal systems and the response of these countries to the challenges to the network environment. Civil law countries are mainly France, In Germany and Japan, the author focuses on the rational use system in Japan and its two schemes on modifying mental rights to adapt to the development of the network in 1994. The common law countries mainly introduce the United Kingdom and the United States. This paper mainly introduces the process of Britain and America from not recognizing spiritual right to protecting spiritual right and restricting the rational use of spiritual right. In addition, the author also briefly mentions several major international conventions. Such as the Berne Convention, the World copyright Convention and other relevant provisions on spiritual rights. The fourth part is the core of this article, The author discusses how to reconstruct spiritual rights in order to adapt to the development of the Internet by referring to the experiences of the two major legal system countries, the author mainly focuses on the reconstruction of the connotation of spiritual rights. Combining the right of modification with the right to protect the integrity of the work, redefining the connotation of the right to protect the integrity of the work, reconstructing the limitation of spiritual rights and powers, introducing the system of rational use, and permitting the transfer and licensing of spiritual rights conditionally. In this part, the author discusses how to reconstruct the regulations of typical countries and how to choose and choose the regulations of typical countries with a great deal of pen and ink in order to perfect the organization of collective right management of works and bring the protection of spiritual rights into the scope of their rights.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】