民法典总则意思表示瑕疵的体系构造——兼评《民法总则》相关规定

发布时间：2018-03-24 20:05

本文选题：意思表示　切入点：瑕疵类型　出处：《当代法学》2017年05期

【摘要】：意思表示的构成与瑕疵类型的划分受意思主义与表示主义的影响,其效力设置则取决于意思自治与信赖保护之间的调适。我国意思表示瑕疵类型可分为真意保留、通谋虚伪表示、错误、欺诈、胁迫、显失公平,以及表示意识的欠缺。对于不存在相对人信赖保护的类型,意思表示瑕疵的效力应当尊重表意人的意思自治;对于存在相对人或第三人信赖保护的类型则相反。因现代社会信赖保护和交易安全的需求日益强烈,民法典总则应当贯彻善意相对人或第三人的合理信赖优先于表意人的意思自治的立法政策,并以此为基础设置意思表示瑕疵效力的技术性规范。
[Abstract]:The constitution of expression of will and the division of defective type are influenced by will doctrine and expressionism, and its validity is determined by the adjustment between autonomy of will and protection of trust. Collusive hypocrisy, error, fraud, coercion, explicit injustice, and lack of consciousness. For the absence of the type of relative trust protection, the effectiveness of the defect of will should respect the autonomy of the ideographer; The opposite is true for the type of relative or third party trust protection. Because of the increasing demand for trust protection and transaction security in modern society, The general principles of the Civil Code should implement the legislative policy that the reasonable trust of the bona fide relative person or the third party should take precedence over the will autonomy of the ideographer, and set up the technical norms on the basis of which the effectiveness of the intention to indicate defects can be expressed.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;
【基金】：2015年国家社科基金后期资助项目“意思表示瑕疵:学说与规范”(15FFX035)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】