个人信息控制者违约赔偿责任研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 19:32

  本文选题：个人信息控制者　切入点：违约责任　出处：《图书情报工作》2015年02期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]建立个人信息控制者违约责任尤其是赔偿责任机制,为个人信息资源保护立法及个人信息资源的规范合理收集使用提供有力的理论支持。[方法/过程]采用文献分析法、实证分析法、经济分析法、系统分析法以及规范分析法等研究方法,以个人信息资源的权利属性分析为基础,从个人信息收集使用行为的合同关系出发,以个人信息控制者违约责任构成、归责原则和责任方式为突破口,界定违约赔偿范围,最终提出违约赔偿标准解决方案。[结果/结论]通过研究发现,个人信息资源具有典型的财产权和人格权双重属性,个人信息收集和使用关系具有突出的合同属性,个人信息资源财产权具有许可使用费属性;个人信息控制者违约赔偿范围包括精神损害赔偿和财产损失赔偿;赔偿标准应分为一般违约的补偿性赔偿和严重违约的惩罚性赔偿,精神损害赔偿标准应当财产化,财产损失补偿性赔偿的标准应为损失的全部;惩罚性赔偿的标准应为补偿性赔偿标准的3-5倍。本文提出的违约赔偿责任范围、赔偿标准等解决方案和方法具有较强的合理性和可操作性。
[Abstract]:[purpose / significance] establish mechanisms for the liability of personal information controllers for breach of contract, in particular liability, To provide strong theoretical support for the legislation of personal information resources protection and the rational collection and use of personal information resources. [methods / processes] the use of literature analysis, empirical analysis, economic analysis, Based on the analysis of the right attribute of personal information resources and the contractual relationship of personal information collection and using behavior, the systematic analysis and normative analysis are used to constitute the liability of personal information controller for breach of contract. The principle of imputation and the way of liability are the breakthrough point, the scope of compensation for breach of contract is defined, and the standard solution of compensation for breach of contract is put forward. [results / conclusion] through the research, it is found that personal information resources have typical dual attributes of property right and personality right. The relationship between personal information collection and use has prominent contractual attribute, the property right of personal information resource has the attribute of royalty, the scope of compensation for breach of contract by personal information controller includes compensation for moral damage and property loss. The standard of compensation should be divided into compensatory compensation for general breach of contract and punitive damages for serious breach of contract. The standard of compensation for mental damage should be property, and the standard for compensatory compensation for property loss should be the whole of loss. The standard of punitive damages should be 3-5 times of the standard of compensatory damages. The solutions and methods proposed in this paper, such as the scope of liability for breach of contract and the standard of compensation, have strong rationality and maneuverability.
【作者单位】： 华中科技大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6
，

本文编号：1664535