继承特留份制度比较研究
发布时间:2018-04-01 09:12
本文选题:特留份 切入点:必留份 出处:《新疆大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:特留份这个名词来源于古罗马,它经过了几千年的历史发展与变迁,现在已经成为许多国家民法典中的一个专有名词在特留份的历史演变中随着工业革命的发起,私有制经济逐步产生,各国因遗产继承产生的纠纷案件逐渐增多,特留份制度在继承法的其它许多制度中的优点逐渐彰显出来,而我国现有的继承法中只规定了必留份,但是随着经济的不断发展各种因经济纠纷产生的矛盾逐渐显现出来,此时在继承领域也要面对因经济发展而带来的各种问题,我国目前这种落后的法律制度已经不能满足现阶段我国的要求,由此我们要不断的改进我国现存的这种状态,来寻求新的制度。本文先从特留份与必留份的基本概述入手,进而对这两种制度基本概述的了解进行比较得出相同点与不同点。然后通过介绍域外法的一些规定使我们对国外特留份的立法现状有了详细的认识。从而总结出我国建立特留份制度的必要性以及对如何构建我国的特留份制度提出了一些建议,如从明确法定继承人的范围以及明确特留份权利的诉讼时效等方面提出了该制度对我国的借鉴意义。
[Abstract]:After thousands of years of historical development and change, it has become a proper noun in the civil code of many countries with the initiation of the Industrial Revolution.The private ownership economy gradually emerged, the dispute cases caused by the inheritance of each country gradually increased, and the advantages of the special share retention system in many other systems of the inheritance law were gradually revealed, but the existing inheritance law of our country only stipulated that the share must be retained.However, with the continuous development of the economy, various contradictions arising from economic disputes have gradually emerged. At this time, in the field of inheritance, we have to face all kinds of problems brought about by economic development.China's current backward legal system can not meet the requirements of our country at this stage, so we should constantly improve the existing state of our country, to seek a new system.This paper begins with the basic overview of the special reservation and the necessary retention, and then compares the understanding of the two basic outlines and draws the similarities and differences.Then through introducing some provisions of foreign laws, we have a detailed understanding of the foreign legislation.The necessity of establishing the special retention system in our country and some suggestions on how to construct the special retention system in China are summarized.For example, this paper puts forward the significance of this system to our country from the aspects of defining the scope of legal heirs and the limitation of action of the right of special retention.
【学位授予单位】:新疆大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 顾相伟;论继承法采取特留份制度的必要性—由两起遗嘱纠纷案引发的思考[J];大庆高等专科学校学报;2004年02期
2 刘宁;特留份制度探析[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2001年04期
3 李红玲;继承人范围两题[J];法学;2002年04期
4 沈幼伦,孙霞;论遗嘱自由与尊重社会公德——兼谈某“第三者”遗赠纠纷案[J];法学论坛;2002年03期
5 范忠信;遗产赠与的伦理与法理──杭州“小保姆受遗赠案”的几点分析[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年01期
6 黄彤;论特留份制度[J];江南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2002年03期
,本文编号:1694890
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1694890.html