被代理人身份不公开的代理制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 12:22

本文选题：隐名代理　切入点：行纪制度　出处：《南昌大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：代理制度作为私法自治的补充在市场经济下发挥着重要的作用。在外贸代理的背景下我国《合同法》引入了英美法系的被代理人身份不公开的代理制度,规定在委托合同一章中的第403条。但是由于法律文化和法律传统的不同,该制度一经引入即对我国传统的代理制度体系造成了巨大的冲击。究其原因应归结于两大法系法律传统的不同,本文通过对该制度起源的探讨以及两大法系代理制度的比较,进一步论证该制度在我国存在的众多问题,以及该制度的取舍问题。本文共分为四个部分,第一部分阐述了两大法系代理定义以及分类的不同,着重介绍了被代理人身份不公开的代理制度的概念、历史发展以及具体制度规则。第二部分是被代理人身份不公开的代理制度和隐名代理制度、行纪制度以及我国引入的该制度的比较,主要是从各制度的概念、历史发展过程以及法律关系方面进行比较,从而更加深刻的理解英美代理制度。第三部分介绍了我国引入的英美特色制度所存在的争议,该制度的引入给我国代理制度带来的冲击有:与我国法律行为理论和合同相对性原则不符,而且在实践中几乎没有应用。第四部分是对该制度在我国是否应该继续存在的探讨,笔者通过社会现实、法律传统以及制度功能三个方面阐述该制度,论证该制度的必要性问题。
[Abstract]:Agency system, as a supplement of private law autonomy, plays an important role in the market economy.Under the background of foreign trade agency, the contract Law of our country introduces the agent system of the common law system, which is not open, and stipulates the Article 403 in the chapter of entrustment contract.However, due to the difference between legal culture and legal tradition, the system has a great impact on the traditional agency system.The reason should be attributed to the difference of legal tradition between the two legal systems. Through the discussion of the origin of the system and the comparison of the agency system between the two legal systems, this paper further demonstrates the many problems existing in the system in our country, as well as the choice and choice of the system.This paper is divided into four parts. In the first part, the definition and classification of agency in two legal systems are discussed, and the concept, historical development and specific rules of agency system are introduced.The second part is the agency system and anonymous agency system, the disciplinary system and the introduction of this system in China, mainly from the concept of each system, historical development process and legal relations.Thus a deeper understanding of the Anglo-American agency system.The third part introduces the controversy of the Anglo-American characteristic system introduced in our country. The impact brought by the introduction of this system to our country's agency system is that it is inconsistent with the theory of legal act and the principle of relativity of contract in our country.And in practice almost no application.The fourth part discusses whether the system should continue to exist in our country. The author expounds the system through the social reality, the legal tradition and the system function, and proves the necessity of the system.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】