专利侵权中停止侵害责任适用上的限制问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 01:35

本文选题：专利侵权　切入点：永久禁令　出处：《湖南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：专利侵权救济问题随着专利领域的复杂发展而更被予重视,停止侵害责任作为专利侵权当然救济方式对专利人权利的保护长期显现不可替代的功能。然而,近年来浮现的少量司法案例正以一种微弱的力量推翻着停止侵害责任在专利侵权领域中的绝对适用的正当性。社会公共利益的引导、当事人之间利益的偏颇以及因于停止侵害责任当然适用而带来的权利滥用问题都为专利侵权中停止侵害责任适用上的限制成为可能。透彻比对分析停止侵害责任的知识产权请求权本质与民事责任性质,摸清停止侵害责任具备复杂的适存脉络。专利侵权中停止侵害责任与美国永久禁令仅仅作用类似而并非完全相同,美国永久禁令制度的发展给我国专利侵权中停止侵害责任适用上的限制问题研究带来启示。抑制停止侵害责任泛化适用带来的权利滥用、平衡社会公共利益的内在需求、鼓励专利技术创新以及促进专利商业实施都成为限制停止侵害责任适用所能带来的积极意义。大量司法实践证明社会公共利益倾斜成为限制停止侵害责任适用的具体事由,其限制具备正义性。社会公共利益类型百态造成社会公共利益界限难以明确,以案例指导形式明确社会公共利益已然成为趋势。当事人之间利益平衡符合经济利益保全理论的内在要求,但是经济利益保全理论与专利法激励创新理论又存在某种程度的冲突。专利侵权中的停止侵害责任与损害赔偿责任之间适用关系的随意性造成限制问题解决的瓶颈,在专利侵权中将损害赔偿责任优先适用作为限制适用的路径并划分损害赔偿责任优先适用的情形。停止侵害责任限制之后,专利权人经由司法强制许可获得权利的救济,司法强制许可之后也需对专利权利的进一步侵害有所防范。
[Abstract]:With the complex development of patent field, the problem of patent infringement relief has been paid more attention to. As a natural remedy for patent infringement, the protection of patentee's rights can not be replaced by stopping infringement liability for a long time.However, a small number of judicial cases emerged in recent years are undermining the validity of the absolute application of cessation of infringement liability in the field of patent infringement.The guidance of the social public interest, the bias of the interests between the parties and the abuse of rights brought about by the application of the right to stop the infringement liability are all possible for the limitation of the application of the right to stop the infringement liability in the patent infringement.Comparing thoroughly and analyzing the nature of intellectual property right claim and civil liability, we can find out that stop infringement liability has complex and suitable context.The action of stopping infringement liability in patent infringement is similar to that of the permanent prohibition in the United States. The development of the permanent prohibition system in the United States has brought enlightenment to the study on the limitation of the limitation of the limitation of the application of the suspension liability in the patent infringement in our country.Restraining the abuse of rights brought about by the generalized application of stop infringing liability balancing the inherent demand of social public interest encouraging the innovation of patent technology and promoting the commercial implementation of patent are all the positive meanings that can be brought by restricting the application of stop infringing liability.A large number of judicial practices prove that the inclination of social public interest is the concrete reason for restricting the application of the liability for cessation of infringement, and its restriction is just.The classification of social public interest makes it difficult to define the boundaries of social public interest, and it has become a trend to clarify the social public interest in the form of case guidance.The balance of interests between the parties conforms to the inherent requirements of the theory of economic interest preservation, but there are some conflicts between the theory of economic interest preservation and the theory of stimulating innovation in patent law.The arbitrariness of the applicable relationship between the liability for cessation of infringement and the liability for damages in patent infringement causes the bottleneck of solving the limitation problem.In patent infringement, the priority of liability for damages is applied as the path of limiting application and the case of priority application of liability for damages is divided.After stopping the limitation of infringement liability, the patentee obtains the right relief through the judicial compulsory license, and after the judicial compulsory license, he also needs to prevent the further infringement of the patent right.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】