动产担保统一登记制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 14:19

本文选题：动产担保　切入点：登记　出处：《山东大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着经济的发展,担保制度逐渐呈现由传统的债权保全向融资媒介发展,由单纯的价值控制到注重物效利用发展的趋势,登记制度引入动产担保领域是融资领域的一大突破,其为非转移占有担保的设定提供了制度保障。登记制度同时也解决了无体财产权担保问题。但登记制度广泛应用也导致了担保法律体系的混乱,担保类型种类繁多、登记机关不一、登记程序不一等问题,一定程度上制约了动产担保融资的发展,为此,以美国为代表的国家率先进行动产担保法律制度改革,构建了动产担保统一登记制度体系,该体系包括登记法律规范的统一、登记范围的统一,登记程序的统一和登记效力的统一。我国的动产担保融资也进入了相对活跃的时期,但是我国的担保法律制度具有相对滞后性,无法满足现代金融实践的发展需求,因而需要构建现代、高效的动产担保法律体系,而登记制度是其中的重要一环,连接着实体和程序,在整个动产担保制度起着重要作用。本文采用对比分析的方法,在借鉴域外的动产担保统一登记制度的基础上,分析我国目前存在的动产权属统一登记的运作模式,以求完善我国的动产担保登记制度。全文共分为四章。第一章首先介绍了动产担保中登记的引入、登记的功能,之后介绍了统一的动产担保登记制度如何在美国产生,如何被其他国家借鉴,最后是其内容构成,指出其包括法律规范、登记范围、登记程序,登记机关、登记效力的统一。第二章是对域外动产担保统一登记制度的考察,在其中选取《联合国贸易法委员会动产担保交易示范法》为范本,在实体上,《示范法》建立了统一的动产担保权的概念体系,从而实现了登记范围的统一；在登记程序上,其主张建立中央统一的登记机关,构建符合动产担保的登记程序,采用单方申请主义、形式审查、通知登记制度等；在登记效力上采用的符合效率的登记对抗主义。第三章探讨我国的统一登记制度,我国担保法律体系不完善,缺乏体系化,导致登记公示的范围确定存在着争议,在登记程序方面,登记机关分散,登记程序不合理,阻碍了担保融资实践,因而实务中,中国人民银行联合其他部门积极构建我国的动产权属统一登记系统,本文通过对我国的运作模式的分析,发现其有积极意义但也存在着严重不足。第四章是探讨如何完善我国动产担保统一登记制度。指出要从法律规范的体系化、统一登记机关、促进登记程序的完善、登记效力上采登记对抗主义这几个方面予以完善。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy, the system of guarantee has gradually developed from the traditional creditor's right preservation to the financing medium, from simple value control to the development of material effect utilization. The introduction of registration system into the field of movable property security is a breakthrough in the field of financing.It provides system guarantee for the creation of non-transfer possession guarantee.The registration system also solves the problem of guarantee of property rights without body.However, the wide application of registration system also leads to the confusion of the legal system of security. There are various types of security, different registration authorities and different registration procedures, which to some extent restrict the development of secured financing for movable property.The countries represented by the United States take the lead in the reform of the legal system of chattel security, and construct a unified registration system of chattel security, which includes the unification of the legal norms of registration and the unification of the scope of registration.The unification of registration procedure and registration effect.The secured financing of movable property in our country has also entered a relatively active period, but the legal system of guarantee in our country is relatively lagging behind and unable to meet the needs of the development of modern financial practice. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a modern and efficient legal system of chattel security.The registration system is one of the important links, linking entities and procedures, in the entire chattel security system plays an important role.This paper adopts the method of comparative analysis, on the basis of referring to the unified registration system of chattel security outside the country, analyzes the operating mode of unified registration of chattel property right in our country at present, in order to perfect the chattel security registration system in our country.The full text is divided into four chapters.The first chapter introduces the introduction and function of registration in chattel guarantee, and then introduces how the unified chattel guarantee registration system comes into being in the United States, how to be used for reference by other countries, and finally its content composition.It includes legal norms, registration scope, registration procedure, registration authority and unification of registration effectiveness.The second chapter is the investigation of the uniform registration system of the security of movable assets, in which the Model Law on secured transactions in movable assets of the United Nations Commission on Trade Law is selected as the model. In the entity, the Model Law establishes a unified conceptual system of security rights in movable assets.In the registration procedure, it advocates the establishment of a central unified registration authority, the establishment of a registration procedure that conforms to the guarantee of movable property, the adoption of unilateral application, formal examination, notification of registration system, etc.An efficient register antagonism used in the effectiveness of registration.The third chapter discusses the unified registration system of our country. The legal system of guarantee in our country is imperfect and lack of systematization, which leads to the controversy of the scope of registration publicity. In the aspect of registration procedure, the registration authority is dispersed and the registration procedure is unreasonable.Therefore, in practice, the people's Bank of China, in conjunction with other departments, actively constructs a unified registration system for the ownership of movable property in China.It is found that it has positive significance, but there are also serious deficiencies.Chapter four discusses how to perfect the unified registration system of chattel guarantee in our country.It is pointed out that it is necessary to perfect the registration procedure from the aspects of systematization of legal norms, unification of registration organs, improvement of registration procedure and adoption of registration antagonism in registration effectiveness.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】