TPP中网络服务提供者责任问题研究
发布时间:2018-04-03 17:08
本文选题:TPP 切入点:网络服务提供者 出处:《北京外国语大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:在著作权网络侵权中,行为人的侵权行为往往需要借助网络服务提供者所提供的服务或设施,因此探讨网络服务提供者在此情形下是否以及如何承担著作权侵权责任的问题,一直伴随着着整个互联网技术的发展。网络产业和著作权产业背后所包含的巨大经济价值,使得发达国家开始寻求建立更高的保护标准,以维护其海外利益。由于越来越多的发展中国家能够表达自身的利益诉求参与国际谈判,寻求建立如WIPO或者WTO的多边谈论愈加困难。在此背景下,发达国家寻求通过建立地区谈判以达到其跨国保护知识产权的目的,TPP便是在此背景下制定和讨论的。 TPP是由包括美国、日本等12个太平洋地区的国家参与谈判的。从披露的TPP文本来看,目前还处于谈判阶段的TPP代表了未来知识产权国际保护的最高标准,要求网络服务提供者承担更多的注意义务。TPP围绕网络服务提供者的免责条件、法定义务和通知与移除规则问题进行谈判,体现了各参与谈判国的立法意志。因此,研究TPP中网络服务提供者的责任问题,有助于我们了解该领域内的立法动态,同时,也是未来我国参与国际条约的重要参考。基于此,本文除引言和结语外,分以下三个部分进行架构: 第一部分,网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任概述。本章主要介绍网络服务提供者的基本概念,如何认定网络服务提供者的范围,以及网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任类型。 第二部分,TPP中网络服务提供者责任问题研究。本章立足于目前披露的两个版本的TPP,对比、分析两个文本中的不同之处,同时阐述各个条款的适用逻辑,归纳,整理TPP中所代表的国际知识产权保护的最高保护标准。 第三部分,我国网络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的立法和建议。梳理我国目前网.络服务提供者著作权侵权责任的法律制度,分析该制度与TPP的异同,以及TPP对我国的启示。
[Abstract]:In the network copyright infringement, the infringement behavior of people often need the help of services or facilities to provide Internet service providers, so the discussion of the network service provider in this case whether and how to undertake the copyright infringement liability, has been accompanied by the development of Internet technology. The network behind the industry and copyright industries included the huge economic value, the developed countries began to seek to establish higher standards of protection, to protect its overseas interests. Due to the increasing number of developing countries to express their interest appeal to participate in international negotiations, seeking to establish such as WIPO or WTO multilateral talk more difficult. Under this background, the developed countries to seek to achieve the international protection of intellectual the purpose of property rights through the establishment of regional negotiations, TPP is developed and discussed in this context.
TPP is by including the United States, Japan and other 12 countries in the Pacific region involved in the negotiations. From the text of the TPP disclosure, is still in the negotiation stage of the TPP represents the future of the highest standards of international protection of intellectual property rights, the exemption conditions require internet service providers to bear.TPP duty of care more about the Internet service provider, to negotiate notice and remove the legal obligations and rules, reflects the will of the legislation involved in the negotiations of China. Therefore, the responsibility of the network service provider TPP, helps us understand the legislation in the field of dynamic, at the same time, it is also an important reference for the future of China's participation in international treaties. Based on this, in addition to the introduction and the epilogue is divided into three parts for architecture:
The first part is the overview of the copyright infringement liability of the Internet service providers. This chapter mainly introduces the basic concept of the network service providers, how to identify the scope of the network service providers, and the types of copyright infringement liability of the network service providers.
The second part of the network service provider liability in TPP. This chapter is based on the two version of the present disclosure, TPP, comparative analysis of the difference between the two texts in the application logic, and explains the various terms of induction, the highest standards of protection finishing the international protection of intellectual property rights represented by TPP.
The third part, the legislation and suggestion of the copyright infringement liability of our Internet service providers. We comb the legal system of the copyright infringement liability of our online service providers, analyze the similarities and differences between the system and TPP, and TPP's inspiration to China.
【学位授予单位】:北京外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘昌黎;;TPP的内容、特点与日本参加的难题[J];东北亚论坛;2011年03期
2 刘中伟;沈家文;;跨太平洋伙伴关系协议(TPP):研究前沿与架构[J];当代亚太;2012年01期
3 左玉茹;;ACTA的飞跃 基于ACTA与TRIPS协定的比较研究[J];电子知识产权;2010年11期
4 吴汉东;;侵权责任法视野下的网络侵权责任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期
5 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
6 黄先蓉;李魏娟;;从SOPA的博弈看美国数字出版法律制度的利益平衡[J];现代出版;2012年06期
7 郑双双;;浅析TPP协定投资草案[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2013年10期
8 刘宇;;TPP知识产权最大化国际保护新发展析论——以著作权若干规则为切入点[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2014年04期
9 司晓;范露琼;;知识产权领域“通知—删除”规则滥用的法律规制[J];电子知识产权;2015年Z1期
10 杨明;;《侵权责任法》第36条释义及其展开[J];华东政法大学学报;2010年03期
,本文编号:1706126
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1706126.html