《侵权责任法》第40条的基础理论探析

发布时间：2018-04-03 17:21

本文选题：第三人侵权　切入点：安全保障义务　出处：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在第三人袭击校园伤害学生的侵害事故中,受害学生和家长在获得法律救济过程中主要的法律依据就是《侵权责任法》第40条。然而本文通过对《侵权责任法》第40条进行基础理论分析过程中发现,其价值定位有悖于《侵权责任法》的“权利救济法”核心价值定位之立场,对受害学生的救济力度不够,在应然的角度上有失公平公正。有鉴于此,本文以“归责原则”和“受害人的法益保护及救济”为出发点对《侵权责任法》第40条进行横向和纵向的比较分析：横向上,通过第40条与第37条和38条的比较分析可知第40条的存在使得整部《侵权责任法》的体系呈现出不一或日紊乱；纵向上,通过对第40条的价值定位的分析可知其有悖于《侵权责任法》的“权利救济法”的核心价值定位。最后本文从解释论和立法论的角度对《侵权责任法》第40条进行了有益于受害学生的论述和建议,以期能够平衡处于弱势群体地位的受害学生之法律利益。
[Abstract]:In the case of the third person attacking the campus to injure the students, the main legal basis for the injured students and their parents in the process of obtaining legal relief is Article 40 of the Tort liability Law.However, through the basic theoretical analysis of Article 40 of the Tort liability Law, it is found that its value orientation is contrary to the core value orientation of the right Relief Law of the Tort liability Law, and the relief to the injured students is not enough.There is a lack of fairness and justice from the point of view of what should be done.In view of this, this paper makes a horizontal and vertical comparative analysis of Article 40 of the Tort liability Law based on the "imputation principle" and "legal interest protection and relief of the victim": horizontally,Through the comparative analysis of article 40 with articles 37 and 38, it can be seen that the existence of article 40 makes the whole system of Tort Law appear different or disordered day by day.Through the analysis of the value orientation of Article 40, it can be seen that Article 40 is contrary to the core value orientation of the right remedy Law of Tort liability Law.Finally, from the angle of interpretation and legislation, the article 40 of the Tort liability Law is discussed and suggested to benefit the injured students, in order to balance the legal interests of the injured students in the position of the disadvantaged groups.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】