当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

拍卖人的信息提供义务与担保责任——从居间商的法律地位出发

发布时间:2018-04-05 13:50

  本文选题:信息提供义务 切入点:调查义务 出处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2017年06期


【摘要】:拍卖人属于居间商,对竞买人的主要义务为信息提供义务,在不能提供拍卖委托人的真实、具体身份信息时,须对买卖合同的履行负责。就拍卖标的瑕疵而言,应从是否属于消费者买卖,拍卖人是否承担出卖人义务,瑕疵是否涉及违法性、安全性或按照合理商业标准应当告知等方面出发,确定拍卖人履行信息提供义务的标准。作为居间商的拍卖人须按照交易中必要的注意标准进行积极调查。拍卖场合的瑕疵担保责任并非法定责任的保留地,而是违约救济的组成部分。仅作为居间人的拍卖人不必担保标的无瑕疵,而承担出卖人义务的拍卖人原则上应担保标的无瑕疵,此时免除瑕疵担保责任的格式条款可因违反《合同法》第40条无效;此类免责条款有效时,根据《民法总则》第132条,明知或应知瑕疵的拍卖人对其援用也构成滥用民事权利。拍卖人损害赔偿责任的范围根据其是否承担出卖人义务而有所不同。对《买卖合同司法解释》第33条但书,应严格限定其适用范围。
[Abstract]:The auctioneer belongs to the middleman and is responsible for the performance of the sale contract when he cannot provide the true and specific identity information of the auctioneer for the main obligation of the bidder.As far as the defects of the auction object are concerned, we should proceed from such aspects as whether they belong to consumer trading, whether the auctioneer undertakes the seller's obligations, whether the defects are illegal, safe or should be informed according to reasonable commercial standards, etc.Determine the criteria for the auctioneer to fulfil his obligation to provide information.The auctioneer as an intermediary shall conduct an active investigation in accordance with the necessary standards of care in the transaction.The imperfection guarantee liability in auction is not the reserve of legal liability, but the part of breach of contract relief.The auctioneer who is only an intermediary does not need to guarantee the subject matter without defect, but the auctioneer who undertakes the seller's obligation should, in principle, guarantee that the subject matter is without defects. At this time, the form clause of the exemption from the liability for the guarantee of defects may be invalid because of the violation of Article 40 of the contract Law;When such exemption clauses are in force, according to Article 132 of the General principles of Civil Law, the use of them by an auctioneer who knows or ought to know the defects also constitutes an abuse of civil rights.The scope of the auctioneer's liability for damages varies according to whether the auctioneer undertakes the seller's obligations.The proviso to Article 33 of the Judicial interpretation of the contract of Sale and purchase should be strictly limited in its scope of application.
【作者单位】: 中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(17YJC820054) 中央财经大学青年教师发展基金项目(QJJ1531) 国家社科基金项目(16CFX055)
【分类号】:D923.6

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 范健;;德国居间商法律制度评析[J];中外法学;1993年06期

2 王雷;;商事代理类似制度辨析[J];商业文化(下半月);2011年03期

3 王龙海;;论拍卖中拍卖人的保管义务[J];中国拍卖;2005年11期

4 于新循;;论代理商:法律上的严格判断——以《深圳经济特区商事条例》为参照[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前3条

1 苗滋滨;拍卖人的瑕疵担保义务[N];人民法院报;2004年

2 管晓峰;拍卖师低于保留价拍卖应如何处理[N];检察日报;2004年

3 实习生 周璐s,

本文编号:1715035


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1715035.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0eccd***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com