当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

人格权的经济利益研究

发布时间:2018-04-08 22:38

  本文选题:人格权 切入点:财产权 出处:《长春工业大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:在传统的人格权理论中,人身专属性和非财产性是人格权的两个基本特征,因此针对侵权行为只涉及精神损害赔偿。但是当社会经济水平发展至一定阶段,人格权商业利用范围得到极大的扩展,姓名权、名誉权等人格要素开始具备财产价值。然而,受传统人格权观念影响颇深的司法实践仍不承认人格权所具备的财产价值。即便有些承认人格权的财产价值,但在具体的保护实践当中依旧存在法理依据不清晰等问题。本文从梳理人格与人格权的发展历程入手,在回顾中逐步揭示了人格以及人格权理论在不断发展的历程中所展现的开放性的特征,这一重要特征的发现从理论上证明了人格权理论可以作出调整以适应人格需要的可行性。从而,笔者提出在人格要素的商业利用实践中,对于不能够对其提供有效保护的人格权理论以及司法实践也亟需作出调整。文章回顾了人格权和财产权之间的关系发展史,展示了二者从混同到分离再到融合的发展历程。在此基础上,笔者阐释了自然人人格要素具备人格权属性,标表型人格权具备财产权属性,在人格要素的商业利用实践中处分的是其人格权,利用的是其人格权利益等问题。文章对上述问题的一系列探讨对于研究人格权经济利益的相关问题打下了坚实的理论基础。
[Abstract]:In the traditional theory of right of personality, personal attributes and non property are two basic characteristics of the right of personality, so for the infringement relates only to spiritual damages. But when the level of socio-economic development to a certain stage, the commercial use of personality right to extend greatly the range, the right of name, reputation and other personality factors with the value of the property. However, the value of judicial practice which is deeply influenced by the traditional concept of personality right still does not recognize the right of personality has the property value. Even if some admit the right of personality and property, but in practice still protect the problems existing in the legal basis is not clear. This article from the development process of combing personality and personality right firstly, in retrospect gradually reveals the personality characteristics and open personality theory show in the course of development in the discovery of this important feature is proved from the theory of personality The theory of the right adjustments can be made to adapt to the feasibility of personality needs. Thus, the author puts forward the personality factors of commercial use in practice, for the personality theory can't provide effective protection to the judicial practice and also need to be adjusted. This paper reviews the development history of the relationship between personality right and property right, the two from the show confused to separation and to the development of fusion. On this basis, the author explains the elements of the personality of natural person have the property right of personality, individual personality rights have the property rights, the commercial use of personality factors in practice. The personality right is the use of their human rights problems. Based on the above interests the problem of a series of discussions on issues related to the economic interests of the right of personality to lay a solid theoretical foundation.

【学位授予单位】:长春工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D913

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张红;;“以营利为目的”与肖像权侵权责任认定——以案例为基础的实证研究[J];比较法研究;2012年03期

2 刘清生;;论民事侵权中的过错[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2009年02期

3 蓝蓝;;人格与财产二元权利体系面临的困境与突破——以“人格商品化”为视角展开[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年03期

4 杨立新;林旭霞;;论人格标识商品化权及其民法保护[J];福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期

5 王利明;;论人格权商品化[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年04期

6 瞿灵敏;;论商品化人格权[J];东方法学;2014年01期

7 王叶刚;;人格权中经济价值“可让与性”之反思——以人格尊严的保护为视角[J];广东社会科学;2014年02期

8 范晓峰;试论人格权的经济利益与保护[J];河北法学;2002年05期

9 谢怀h;;论民事权利体系[J];法学研究;1996年02期

10 姜福晓;;对人格权财产化和财产权人格化统一解释的初步思考[J];理论月刊;2013年09期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 刘勇;论人格权财产利益的私法保护[D];扬州大学;2014年



本文编号:1723699

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1723699.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户b6211***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com