一房多卖的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-09 11:19

本文选题：一房多卖　切入点：合同效力　出处：《黑龙江大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：“一物数卖,自古有之”,随着我国市场经济的飞速发展,与日俱增的大量私有房产的交易同样带来了大量的经济纠纷,一些人盲目追求利益最大化,“罔顾信用,图谋私利”,导致一房多卖的情况屡禁不止。出现这种结果,根本原因莫过于在交易中如何区分不动产物权和债权、如何认定由同一不动产产生的数个买卖合同效力以及如何确定不动产物权的归属。在同一个买卖合同中,因物权与债权不同的区分方式,导致多个买卖合同的效力不尽相同。因物权变动模式不同,又导致最终的房屋物权归属不同。也正因为在一房多卖案件中,涉及多种法律关系、多个交易主体和多种利益需求,才更要求司法实务界及理论界在物权变动问题和债权效力问题中进行利益权衡和取舍,以此解决交易中所发生的各种利益矛盾。为此,本文以案例分析的形式展开讨论,借助于因付某一房多卖行为而引发的何某诉刘某侵权纠纷案的两审判决结果,具体分析了一房多卖中的两大突出法律问题——后形成的买卖合同的效力和物权变动规则。本文共五部分,结构如下：引言部分简要说明了本文写作的起因、目的以及我国立法对此问题的研究现状和本文论述的现实意义。正文第一部分简要介绍了本文据以研究的案例及两审法院作出的不同判决结果,并由此总结出本文重点论述的两点争议焦点,最后浅析了一房多卖的产生原因。正文第二、三部分就前文归纳的两点争议焦点展开了详细的论述。其中,第二部分论述了后形成买卖合同的效力问题,通过分别阐述无效说和效力待定说的观点和不足,进而集中论述了有效说的理论依据。第三部分通过简介大陆法系物权变动模式引出我国采取的物权变动模式和选择该模式的原因,最后根据我国的物权变动模式归纳出七种情况下一房多卖房屋所有权归属。两部分的最后都结合案例进行了评析了两审法官的选择。结论部分在对全文进行小结的同时,提出了对立法和司法实践中的若干意见,以期待本文能为解决一房多卖问题有所裨益。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of China's market economy, the increasing number of private property transactions have also brought a large number of economic disputes.To seek personal gain ", resulting in a more than the sale of housing situation repeatedly prohibited.The basic reason is how to distinguish between real property and creditor's right, how to determine the validity of several sales contracts produced by the same real estate and how to determine the ownership of real estate.In the same contract of sale, because of the difference between real right and creditor's right, the effectiveness of multiple contracts is different.Because the real right change mode is different, also causes the final house property right to belong to different.It is also because of the multiple legal relations, multiple transaction subjects and various interest needs in the case of multi-sale of one house that the judicial practice and the theoretical circle are required to weigh and choose the interests between the real right change and the validity of the creditor's rights.In order to resolve the transaction occurred in various conflicts of interest.Therefore, in the form of a case study, this paper discusses the outcome of the second instance judgment in the case of he Mou v. Liu Mou's tort dispute caused by the overselling of a house.This paper analyzes the two outstanding legal problems in the overselling of one house-the validity of the contract of sale and the rules of the change of real right.There are five parts in this paper. The structure is as follows: the introduction briefly explains the origin, the purpose of this article, the present situation of our country's legislation on this issue and the practical significance of this paper.The first part of the text briefly introduces the case on which this article is based and the different judgments made by the court of second instance, and sums up the two focal points of dispute discussed in this paper. Finally, the author analyzes the reasons for more sale of one house.The second and third parts of the text discuss the two controversial points summarized above in detail.Among them, the second part discusses the effect of the formation of the contract of sale and purchase, and then focuses on the theoretical basis of the effective theory by expounding the views and deficiencies of the theory of invalidity and the theory of validity to be determined.The third part induces the mode of real right change and the reason of choosing this mode by introducing the mode of real right change in civil law system. Finally, according to the mode of real right change in our country, we conclude the ownership of one house selling more houses under seven kinds of circumstances.At the end of the two parts, the author evaluates the choice of the two-instance judge in combination with the case.The conclusion part summarizes the whole paper and puts forward some suggestions on legislation and judicial practice in order to hope that this paper can be helpful to solve the problem of one house selling more.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】