软件著作权侵权诉讼中Telnet取证的合理适用

发布时间：2018-04-09 21:13

本文选题：软件著作权侵权　切入点：TELNET取证　出处：《中国版权》2015年05期

【摘要】：近两年,某软件著作权人利用TELNET协议远程登录被控侵权人的网站服务器,并将带有其软件名称的反馈信息经过公证,作为侵权证据,诉请法院判定软件著作权侵权成立。各地法院对此莫衷一是。本文认为,关于TELNET取证在计算机软件著作权侵权判定中的作用,需明晰举证责任完成与否,结合考虑软件著作权侵权判定要素,在综合分析经公证后TELNET取证所获电子数据的证据能力与证据效力后,方能得出较为合理的结论。TELNET取证所获电子数据经公证后,可作为申请法院进行证据保全的证据材料,但尚不足以作为认定存在侵权行为的主要证据。软件著作权侵权判定仍应恪守"接触+实质性相似"的判断规则。
[Abstract]:In the last two years, the software copyright owner remotely logs on the website server of the alleged infringer by using TELNET protocol, and notarizes the feedback information with the name of the software, and as the infringement evidence, appeals to the court to decide the software copyright infringement is established.Courts all over the place disagree on this.This paper holds that the role of TELNET evidence in the judgment of computer software copyright infringement should be made clear whether the burden of proof is completed or not, and the elements of software copyright infringement judgment should be considered.Only after the comprehensive analysis of the evidential ability and validity of the electronic data obtained by TELNET after notarization, can we draw a more reasonable conclusion. After the electronic data obtained by TELNET are notarized, they can be used as evidence materials for the preservation of evidence in the application court.However, it is not enough to be the main evidence of the existence of tort.The judgment of software copyright infringement should still abide by the rule of "contact substantial similarity".
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D923.41

【共引文献】