论惩罚性赔偿在知识产权损害赔偿责任中的适用

发布时间：2018-04-10 15:06

本文选题：知识产权 + 惩罚性损害赔偿　；参考：《辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年05期

【摘要】：2014年5月修改后施行的《商标法》第六十三条增加了对情节严重且主观存在恶意的商标侵权行为予以惩罚性赔偿的规定,但现行《著作权法》及《专利法》并未对惩罚性赔偿做出明确规定,且在我国的学术界、实务界对于惩罚性赔偿的适用条件、参考因素、赔偿额度等基本问题仍存有争议。尤其是在知识产权侵权赔偿中,是否全面适用以及如何适用惩罚性赔偿的立法不够明确、具体,理论研究尚欠系统深入,以致司法实务中法官在具体适用惩罚性赔偿时困难重重,影响裁判的效率和结果。因此,深入、系统地考察商标权、专利权、著作权等知识产权领域侵权惩罚性损害赔偿制度,剖析其正当性与合理性,为我国知识产权保护的立法和司法提供理论依据,实属必要。据此,应在专利权和著作权侵权领域扩大对该制度的适用,明确构成要件,以及确定赔偿金时应考虑的因素和具体的计算方式。
[Abstract]:Section 63 of the Trademark Law, which was amended in May 2014, added punitive damages for serious and subjectively malicious trademark violations.However, the current copyright Law and Patent Law do not make clear provisions on punitive damages, and in the academic circles of our country, there are still disputes about the applicable conditions, reference factors, compensation amount and other basic issues of punitive damages in the academic circles of our country.Especially in the intellectual property rights tort compensation, whether it is fully applicable and how to apply the legislation of punitive damages is not clear enough.As a result, it is difficult for judges to apply punitive damages in judicial practice, which affects the efficiency and result of adjudication.Therefore, the system of punitive damages for infringement of intellectual property rights, such as trademark rights, patent rights, copyright and so on, is thoroughly and systematically investigated, and its legitimacy and reasonableness are analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for the legislation and judicature of intellectual property rights protection in China.It is necessary.Therefore, the application of this system should be expanded in the field of patent right and copyright infringement, and the elements of constitution, the factors to be taken into account and the concrete calculation method should be taken into account in determining the compensation.
【作者单位】：辽宁大学法学院;铁岭市中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】