让与担保法定化研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 13:27

本文选题：让与担保 + 动产抵押　；参考：《昆明理工大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：让与担保是债务人或第三人为担保债务人的债务,将担保标的的整体权利(主要是所有权)移转给债权人,在债务得到清偿后,标的的整体权利返还给担保设定人(即债务人或第三人)；债务届期未受清偿时,债权人得就该担保标的物优先受偿的一种非典型担保方式。其具有标的范围不受限制、是否转移标的物占有取决于当事人约定、实行方式简便灵活等特点,相比传统担保方式更具保障力。现代让与担保肇始于德国,经过虚假表示、流质契约等质疑,逐步被德国、日本等大陆法系国家以学说和判例的形式所确定。然而,在让与担保立法化的过程中,由于该制度的理论模式的不确定性、与动产担保制度的功能重叠可能性、与禁止流质契约和物权法定原则的冲突以及公示困难等问题,导致其有效性和正当性受到一些学者的质疑,使其在各国的立法上尚未被成文化。本文从让与担保的基础理论入手,着重分析了其制度优势和法律构成；然后了解其在发展过程中受到的质疑与阻碍,并对其进行详细分析,对相关质疑进行回应和排除,证明我国建立该制度的有效性,同时对我国实务中的让与担保进行介绍,彰显该制度优越性及独特性,从而证明将该制度法定化的正当性；最后通过了解比较法上的让与担保的立法模式,对让与担保制度在我国的构建提出具体的建议,希望通过此文为我国立法者提供一些参考,为构建具有中国特色的让与担保制度,完善我国的担保体系,促进市场经济健康有效运行贡献一些微薄之力。
[Abstract]:Assignment security is an obligation of the debtor or a third party that is the secured debtor, transfers the whole right (mainly title) of the subject matter of the security to the creditor, and after the debt has been satisfied,The whole right of the subject matter is returned to the grantor (that is, the debtor or the third party); in the event that the debt is not satisfied, the creditor may give priority to an atypical form of security in respect of the subject matter of the security.Its scope is not restricted, whether to transfer possession of the subject matter depends on the agreement of the parties, the way of implementation is simple and flexible, and so on, which is more secure than the traditional way of guarantee.Modern transferable guarantee originated in Germany, through false representation, fluid contract and other doubts, gradually by Germany, Japan and other civil law countries in the form of doctrine and jurisprudence.However, in the process of legislation of transferable security, due to the uncertainty of the theoretical model of the system, the possibility of overlap with the function of the chattel guarantee system, the conflict with the prohibition of fluid quality contract and the principle of property law, and the difficulty of publicity, etc.As a result, its validity and legitimacy have been questioned by some scholars.This article starts with the basic theory of transferable guarantee, analyzes its system advantage and legal constitution, and then understands its challenge and hindrance in the process of development, and makes a detailed analysis of it, and responds to and eliminates the related challenge.To prove the effectiveness of the establishment of the system in China, and at the same time to introduce the transferable guarantee in practice, to highlight the superiority and uniqueness of the system, and thus to prove the legitimacy of legalizing the system;Finally, through understanding the legislative model of transfer guarantee in comparative law, the author puts forward some concrete suggestions on the construction of transfer guarantee system in our country, hoping to provide some references for Chinese legislators through this article.In order to construct the transferable guarantee system with Chinese characteristics, perfect the guarantee system of our country, and promote the healthy and effective operation of the market economy, some modest contributions are made.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】