布兰代斯隐私权思想研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 19:13

  本文选题：布兰代斯 + 隐私权　； 参考：《南京师范大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：研究隐私权,不得不提及的人物是路易斯·D·布兰代斯(Louis D. Brandeis)。他与塞谬尔·D·沃伦(Samuel D. Warren)合著的《隐私权》一文长期占据Heinonline引用率排行榜榜首,国内外学界主流观点认为该文首次阐发了隐私权理论。而他在奥姆斯特德诉美国案(Olmstead v. United States)中的异议意见闻名于世,亦被国内外研究隐私权理论的学者不断引用。他在吉尔伯特诉明尼苏达州案(Gilbert v. Minnesotae)中的异议意见、帕克公司诉犹他州案(Packer Corporation v.Utah)中所著的法庭意见中也包含隐私权思想,影响深远。“侵权隐私权——宪法隐私权”这一分析工具易令人只关注到侵权主体的区别,更为恰当的分析工具是尼尔·理查德(Neil M. Richards)教授所阐释的侵权隐私权、智识隐私权二分法。布兰代斯在其一生中,关于隐私权与言论自由关系的思想不断发展变化,陷入自己在《隐私权》一文中所宣称的侵权理论的深刻矛盾之中。布兰代斯隐私权思想经历了由侵权隐私权变为智识隐私权的转向。
[Abstract]:The person to be mentioned in the study of privacy is Louis D. Brandeisan.His paper "Privacy", co-written by Samuel D. Warren and Samuel D. Warren, has long occupied the top of the list of Heinonline citations. The mainstream view at home and abroad holds that this article has for the first time elucidated the theory of privacy.His dissent in Olmstead v. United States is well known and cited by scholars studying privacy theories at home and abroad.His dissent in Gilbert v. Minnesotae in Gilbert v. Minnesota and Packer Corporation v. Utah in Parker v. Utah also contained the idea of privacy.The analysis tool of "tort privacy-constitutional privacy" makes people pay attention only to the difference of the subject of infringement. The more appropriate analysis tool is the dichotomy of intellectual privacy and infringing privacy explained by Professor Neil Richard M. Richard.In his life, Brandis' thoughts on the relationship between privacy and freedom of speech have been constantly changing, falling into the profound contradiction of tort theory claimed by him in "Privacy".The thought of Brandeis' right of privacy has changed from infringing right of privacy to intellectual right of privacy.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D913
，

本文编号：1741052