我国地理标志维权诉讼中若干问题探讨

发布时间：2018-04-12 21:10

本文选题：地理标志 + 地理标志权　；参考：《昆明理工大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国绝大部分的地理标志产品为涉农性产品,因此地理标志对于农业经济发展、农民收入增加、农村全面发展等方面具有重要的现实意义。实践也证明,地理标志产业的快速发展已经成为推动我国尤其是中西部地区特色经济、区域品牌发展的新引擎,也是我国大力推进精准扶贫战略的有力抓手。例如以文山三七、普洱茶为代表的地理标志,就大大推动了云南省“云”系列特色产业的快速发展。但是我国地理标志保护制度依然“政出多门”,尤其是对于地理标志侵权盛行和维权艰难等现实问题关注明显不够,使得地理标志权利人所享有的地理标志权处于一种不圆满、不完整的状态。地理标志的侵权主要表现在仿冒、滥用地理标志专用标志和虚假宣传及“傍产地”以误导消费者等方面,使得地理标志市场鱼龙混杂、真假难辨；地理标志维权的艰难主要体现于两方面：一是行政监管低效率。我们对于地理标志维权的传统认识主要是指行政监管部门主动或者被动的执法检查。例如2014年国家质检总局下发了《关于开展2014年度地理标志保护产品专项监督检查工作的通知》,不可否认的是,这种以行政主导的维权模式在一定程度上也在一定时期内规范了地理标志市场秩序,但随着该产业规模的快速扩张以及现代社会发展的需要,“一阵风”式的执法检查根本无法解决地理标志侵权问题；二是司法保护缺位。地理标志司法保护的滞后性不仅表现在地理标志权利人维权意识淡薄,更表现在我国对于地理标志司法保护规定的粗糙以至缺乏可操作性上。本文以地理标志维权诉讼问题为研究对象,对地理标志权进行较为全面的剖析,指出侵权现状及司法诉讼中可能遇到的问题,并在此基础上对诸多问题进行初步理论探讨。本论文由四个核心部分组成：第一,对地理标志维权诉讼中的“权”字进行明确界定,即地理标志权；第二,以侵权责任基本理论为基础,着重分析地理标志侵权的相关问题并指出维权的重要意义；第三,分析我国地理标志司法诉讼进程中可能遇到的现实障碍并进行域外比较；第四,基于上述中谈论到的障碍问题,较有针对性地对原告资格确定、侵权认定标准、损害赔偿、举证责任等几个问题进行初步的理论回应。
[Abstract]:The vast majority of geographical indication products in China are agriculture-related products, so geographical indications have important practical significance for the development of agricultural economy, the increase of farmers' income and the overall development of rural areas.The practice has also proved that the rapid development of geographical indication industry has become a new engine to promote the characteristic economy and regional brand development in China, especially in the central and western regions.For example, the geographical indication represented by Wenshan Sanqi and Pu'er tea has greatly promoted the rapid development of Yunnan's "cloud" series characteristic industries.However, the protection system of geographical indications in our country is still in many fields, especially for the prevalence of infringement of geographical indications and the difficulty of protecting rights, and so on, which makes the geographical indication rights of the right holders of geographical indications in a kind of unsatisfactory.The state of being incomplete.The infringement of geographical indications is mainly manifested in counterfeiting, misuse of special geographical indications and false propaganda and "near the place of production" to mislead consumers, making the geographical indications market mixed, difficult to distinguish between the true and false;The difficulty of protecting the rights of geographical indications is mainly reflected in two aspects: one is the low efficiency of administrative supervision.Our traditional understanding of geographical indication rights mainly refers to the active or passive inspection of law enforcement by the administrative supervision department.For example, in 2014, the State Administration of quality Supervision, Quarantine and Quarantine issued the Circular on the Development of the Special Supervision and Inspection work on Geographical indication Protection products in 2014. What is undeniable is thatTo a certain extent, this executive-led mode of safeguarding rights has also regulated the market order of geographical indications in a certain period of time, but with the rapid expansion of the scale of the industry and the needs of the development of modern society,The law enforcement inspection of "gust wind" can not solve the problem of geographical indication infringement at all; second, the judicial protection is absent.The lag in the judicial protection of geographical indications is not only reflected in the weak awareness of the rights holders of geographical indications, but also in the roughness and lack of maneuverability of the judicial protection of geographical indications in our country.This paper takes the rights of geographical indications as the object of study, analyzes the rights of geographical indications comprehensively, points out the current situation of infringement and the problems that may be encountered in the judicial proceedings, and on this basis makes a preliminary theoretical discussion on many problems.This paper is composed of four core parts: first, define the word "right" in the action of protecting the rights of geographical indications clearly, that is, the right of geographical indication; second, based on the basic theory of tort liability,Focus on the analysis of geographical indications infringement and point out the importance of human rights; third, analysis of the process of geographical indications judicial proceedings in China may encounter practical obstacles and carry out extraterritorial comparison; fourth,Based on the above mentioned obstacles, the author makes a preliminary theoretical response to the qualification of the plaintiff, the standard of tort determination, the compensation for damages, the burden of proof and so on.
【学位授予单位】：昆明理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】